VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed 10 Sep 2008; 9:28pm
Author: info
Subject: What 168 and 174 were used for in 1980s

Fascinating site here about UK Warning and Monitoring (Cold War) Organisation UK-WMO and their radio frequency use
<a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://www.ringbell.co.uk/ukwmo/groupcomms.htm">http://www.ringbell.co.uk/ukwmo/groupcomms.htm</a>

That explains the gap at 168.3 - 168.8 and why there's a 174 band allocated to the home office.

Also mentioned are 147 / 155 links, 452/466 and 12 channels down around 80.3 <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://www.ringbell.co.uk/ukwmo/newpostradio.htm">http://www.ringbell.co.uk/ukwmo/newpostradio.htm</a>

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.