VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]
Subject: Fieger on trial today for comments against judges


Author:
Chris
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 03/ 8/06 7:35pm

Fieger's tirade on docket
He ripped judges; limits may be set

March 8, 2006

BY DAWSON BELL
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

The court is set to hear arguments on a complaint filed nearly five years ago by the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission that stemmed from an obscenity-laced tirade Fieger unleashed on three Michigan appellate judges in 1999 after they overturned a $15-million verdict he had won in a medical malpractice case.

He faces reprimand from the commission, but no suspension, if found responsible for violating Michigan court rules that require lawyers to show respect to the judiciary.

Although the penalties are not severe, the case could set new limits on what lawyers can say outside the courtroom.

But Fieger and his attorneys argue that statements made by lawyers outside the courtroom, especially after a verdict, have nearly absolute protection under the First Amendment.

Criticism of public officials is precisely the kind of speech the First Amendment aimed to protect, said Fieger attorney Michael Schwartz, himself a former grievance administrator.

"Just because you don't like to hear it" doesn't mean it can be punished, he said.

Deputy Commission Administrator Robert Edick said the case is a significant test of what behavior courts may require from attorneys outside court. The panel filed the original charges in 2001.

Since then, the case has bounced around in the courts and before the state's Attorney Discipline Board, which sided with Fieger in 2004, with several side trips to the federal courts, where Fieger argued for the disqualification of state judges he contends are biased against him.

Other complaints have been filed, stemming from his broadsides against other judges. All were dismissed before reaching a Supreme Court hearing.

For today's hearing, Fieger has renewed a request that Justice Stephen Markman recuse himself because of conflicts created by, among other things, a lawsuit Fieger filed against the judge and Attorney General Mike Cox.

Contact DAWSON BELL at 313-222-6604 or dbell@freepress.com.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Fieger on trial today for comments against judgesDiane03/ 8/06 10:48pm


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.