Re: Clinton, Bush, and Feminist Groups -- ExUBF's Parlor

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:00:48 01/27/05 Thu
Author: Chris
Subject: Re: Clinton, Bush, and Feminist Groups
In reply to: PECAS 's message, "Clinton, Bush, and Feminist Groups" on 14:21:27 01/26/05 Wed

Again the problem is that Bush does not get any better if Clinton has his own problems. I heared Clinton has got his own library in Little Rock that costed $160 million dollars and probably has only one major goal of glorifying his life.

I find it interesting that a man who views women as toys for his pleasure is so well praised

I do not think that was his official position about women, or the position he was convinced to have. The problem was that Clinton was a sinner just like everybody else, but a sinner with much power and under much pressure. Since he was not a born again Christian, he had no power to overcome his sinful thoughts, nor any real moral "absolutes." Maybe he even hated himself for doing certain things, because he knew they were wrong, they were against his own ethics, and they were not helpful for his career either. But his flesh for stronger than his spirit. This can even happen to Christians.

I think that Arnold Schwarzenegger is even worse in this regard. He did not even make a secret of how he views women.

Again, please measure Bush on what he is doing and how he is behaving with ethical standards based on the Bible, not with the standards set by his opponents which may be worse in many regards, but better in some other aspects.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Clinton, Bush, and Feminist Groups -- PECAS, 13:12:55 01/27/05 Thu
Re: Clinton, Bush, and Feminist Groups -- Shane, 13:30:12 01/27/05 Thu