Re: Clinton, Bush, and Feminist Groups -- ExUBF's Parlor_Free wheel as far as u can from UBF

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:01:24 01/27/05 Thu
Author: Tony Lang
Subject: Re: Clinton, Bush, and Feminist Groups
In reply to: PECAS 's message, "Clinton, Bush, and Feminist Groups" on 14:21:27 01/26/05 Wed

Ex President Clinton was a naughty boy but I liked his style. Ok he had an affaire in the Oral Office, and maybe he had one or two more, but where is the evidence that he regarded women solely as toys. Are we to judje him just on that.
You are in an art gallery. You see a painting that is so beautiful it reduces you to tears, it is the most wonderful thing you have seen. Then you discover the painter was a serial killer. Are you then going to say you think it is a dreadfull painting. I think we often have to separate the person from his work.
Could Tchaikovsky have writen such beautiful melancholic music if he was not haunted by his homosexuality. I think not.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]