VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:43:49 07/12/08 Sat
Author: troy
Subject: Re: Neonatal Circumcision
In reply to: BR 's message, "Re: Neonatal Circumcision" on 04:14:08 07/12/08 Sat

I know what you are saying about the time that you were circumcised people didn't know the effects of pain or circumcision or the possibilities of antibiotics.But people now understand these and babies are still being circumcised when they don't need it and without anesthesia.

http://www.sickkids.ca/releases/release97/study.asp


http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9712/23/circumcision.anesthetic/

Up to 96 percent of the babies in the United States and Canada receive no anesthesia when they are circumcised, according to a report from the University of Alberta in Edmonton.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.