VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:27:53 03/07/06 Tue
Author: tg
Subject: Re: Help The Breast Cancer site
In reply to: tg 's message, "Help The Breast Cancer site" on 18:26:39 03/07/06 Tue

NO


Here's the website

http://www.thebreastcancersite.com

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> Re: Help The Breast Cancer site -- amadaun, 18:57:16 03/07/06 Tue [1]

Ok, I know you are just trying to help out, but I have a problem supporting the use of mammograms.

Ionizing radiation causes cancer. Mammograms are ionizing radiation. See my problem?

There is no safe dose of radiation. And breast tissue is very sensitive to even tiny amounts of radiation.
Problem two, is that mammograms aren't a reliable diagnositic tool for women under 50. I believe there is a new ultrasound method becoming available, which may be safer.
Breast cancer Societies would be better off telling women how to prevent breast cancer, by avoiding pesticides, hormones and other carcingens.
Also, Iodine deficiency may well be a cause of breast cancer. Iodine supplementation is extremely helpful in fibrocystic breast disease, and could be useful in treating or preventing breast cancer. If only they would look at it..............



""Rosalie Bertell-one of the world's most respected authorities on the dangers of radiation-says one rad increases breast cancer risk one percent and is the equivalent of one year's natural aging. "If a woman has yearly mammograms from age 55 to age 75, she will receive a minimum of 20 rads of radiation. For comparison, women who survived the atomic bomb blasts in Hiroshima or Nagasaki absorbed 35 rads. Though one large dose of radiation can be more harmful than many small doses, it is important to remember that damage from radiation is cumulative."""

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]





Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.