[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:50:59 01/31/06 Tue
Author: stillreign
Subject: Re: the beautiful people
In reply to:
Leo
's message, "Re: the beautiful people" on 21:37:23 01/28/06 Sat
I should have known this was here too. I didn't read it before now.
I did actually post on the AS board. I know I am Internet slut. I need to be careful cyber slumming is how one can get a nasty virus. ;) J/k BTW did you know you can't type the word whore there?
Anyway, it’s all fine and good to me. He can wear a paper bag for the rest of his life or put on pantaloons and a powered wig. I thin he looked kinda nice in the images personally.
I am not exactly sure I am the exact same person I was in my early 20's, so if I can change so can he.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- 23, 13:43:44 02/01/06 Wed [1]
>I am not exactly sure I am the exact same person I was
>in my early 20's, so if I can change so can he.
Sure, people can and should change, but there is change for the positive, and change for the negative.
Becoming a murderer would be a change for the negative. I think modeling rich people clothes, when you formerly refused to use your image to sell someone else's products, is also a change for the negative, in my very humble opinion.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- tg, 15:15:26 02/01/06 Wed [1]
EXACTLY, why do people take all this change in Chris as being all good. Yeah so what if he's in a positive relationship, a positive band. He can still do things that makes no sense.
It doesn't matter, because there is always the CC can do no wrong attitude. That's always there.
I would think of this modelling thing a little differently if I thought it was an interest of his. Brad Wilk did a movie and no-one cared, but I think it was because he wanted to try it. I can't see Chris saying I want to try modelling, I want to be dressed up in someone's clothes. blah
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- lump, 15:55:07 02/01/06 Wed [1]
>I would think of this modelling thing a little
>differently if I thought it was an interest of his.
>Brad Wilk did a movie and no-one cared, but I think it
>was because he wanted to try it. I can't see Chris
>saying I want to try modelling, I want to be dressed
>up in someone's clothes. blah
No, but I have heard him say "Jes, I'd like to model this man-thong for you..."
LMAO! Sorry.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- tg, 16:07:07 02/01/06 Wed [1]
Man-thong!!!! lmao
How about Playgirl?, no clothes. lol
I'm going to invite him to be a nude model for my art class..................in my livingroom.
**May aswell rub it in.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- lump, 16:20:47 02/01/06 Wed [1]
Make it an "ART PARTY" and we'll all come over with our "sketch" books.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- stillreign, 20:20:15 02/01/06 Wed [1]
Because I am not real savvy on my Cornell interview trivia, I totally don't think I ever read the topics about him not wanting to appear for other products. If he’s spoken against such things it surely is funky on Broadway there.
Ugly consumerism aside, as long as no puppies were hurt in the making of the photos it's all-ok by me.
Oh, the use of the term "People" in tg's comment kinda implies that most people are of a like mind on a subject. I really don't think that is the case at all. And I won't be signing up for the “Cornell can do no wrong club” anytime in my future, because he's human and can make funky choices just as well as the next person.
I am personally a bit more concerned over some of the choices he's made with his band rather than him opting to be a human clothes hanger.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- tg, 21:05:58 02/01/06 Wed [1]
Oh sorry I should always say "some" people, because I wouldn't want to talk about all the peeps on the entire planet.
Sometimes I make that mistake when I go off on a rant, that I usually think goes ignored. I'll take my spanking now.
Stilly, I know you are not in the Chris "could do no wrong" group. I was talking about it in general, that's always been around him since he's been famous.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- 23, 08:39:00 02/02/06 Thu [1]
Stilly, I didn't mean to imply that I had heard him specifically say he wouldn't use his image to sell products. He just never did before. I assume he was approached (I assume all celebrities of his stature and attractiveness are), but he said no.
So I'm guessing he used to have some sort of policy about such things that caused him to say no in the past. Maybe not.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- tg, 09:48:46 02/02/06 Thu [1]
So none of us will be surprised when Chris does a GAP commercial. I wonder if he'll do it with the other guys in the band?
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: the beautiful people -- stillreign, 11:14:28 02/02/06 Thu [1]
>Stilly, I didn't mean to imply that I had heard him
>specifically say he wouldn't use his image to sell
>products.
23, I didn't know cause I am the first to admit I am one lazy fan. I have missed a lot of articles over the years, and those I have read I wouldn't remember.
So I thought I could have missed that.
It doesn’t seem to jive with the youthful Cornell but sometimes that happens.
-------------------------------------------------------
on a side note.... Von Dutch was a huge racist, who was said to repented in later days. But his good pals and some of my favorite artist like Robert Williams (who is single handedly responsible for the low brow movement) and artist Ed "Big Daddy" Roth (also from hot rod culture like Von Dutch) talked about it pretty extensively in an article.
Can't find the exact article, but here's a different one.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
