Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Did Negangard and Humphrey think I would just go away? Author: Dan Brewington (vigilant) [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 12:11:15 10/09/15 Fri I took a step back and assessed my options and discovered there's only one direction for me to go; forward. I'm working on the following Petition for Post-Conviction Relief because I'm not going to let Negangard get away with having me indicted and convicted for criminal defamation, while Chief Justice Loretta H. Rush and the Indiana Supreme Court uphold my convictions by substituting a "hidden threat" argument for Negangard's criminal defamation argument because Rush said it was "plainly impermissible." As for the alleged “victims” in my case, Judge James D. Humphrey and Dr. Edward J. Connor, how can my writings be considered criminal yet no one has ever made any effort to have my alleged criminal writings removed from the internet? The two of you are detestable enough for how you abuse children in the family court system. Abusing the criminal process by climbing under Negangard’s wing and allowing him to circumvent civil defamation procedures should place you in the middle of harsh public criticism. If Indiana doesn’t believe I have a right to counsel, evidence, and knowledge of what I was supposed to defend, then I’m going to continue to climb any ladder necessary to get my case before a federal court. So call your buddies Humphrey, Negangard, and Rush so you can have your backroom conversations about how you are going to continue to deprive Dan Brewington of basic constitutional rights because I’m going to continue to fight fair because that’s what I do. As for the detractors who claim I am psychologically disturbed, then I should have been provided with a psychological evaluation at trial and legal counsel willing to meet with me. It’s one or the other. Either I’m crazy and needed psychological attention during trial or there is nothing wrong with me psychologically and the State of Indiana made up the psychological problems it used to justify depriving me of my children and my freedom. Be sure to check out the documentary Divorce Corp on Netflix to see the black eye Humphrey and Negangard have delivered to Dearborn County, Indiana. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Did Negangard and Humphrey think I would just go away? question 08:41:30 10/21/15 Wed