Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Ex-McCain campaign Republican and cyber-securty expert >Stephen Spoonamore discloses in 8-part >MSM-made-but-unaired interview that "Diebold machines >are... designed to steal elections" and that the >Republican Party has been "stealing elections" > > >From Voting Machines Can Never Be Trusted, Says GOP >Computer Security Expert (includes 8-part video >interview): > >If a Democrat said what cyber-security expert Stephen >Spoonamore is saying, he would be dismissed as a >partisan conspiracy theorist > >Regarding the 2000 elections, he says, "There is a >very strong argument to be made that the 2000 election >was electronically stolen, the hanging chads were just >a distraction." [...] > >Interviewer: And yet Diebold does not allow, for >proprietary reasons, anyone to review the vote >tabulation software? > >Spoonamore: They let us work on their cash machines, >but no, they won't let anybody see their software. > >Interviewer: Any thoughts as to why? > >Spoonamore: Because they're stealing elections. > >Referring to the 2002 election results in Georgia, >where Republican Saxby Chambliss defeated incumbent >Senator Max Cleland, Spoon says, "If you look at the >case of Saxby Chambliss, that's ridiculous. The man >was not elected. He lost that election by five points. >Max Cleland won. They flipped the votes, clear as day." > >Spoonamore continues: > >"I do not believe George Bush won [in 2004], I believe >Kerry won. And I'm a member of the GOP. But I want to >make it clear: we need to live in a place where your >[a candidate's] election actually is reflected in the >vote. I want my candidate to win, but if my candidate >loses, I care a lot more about the process than I care >about the victory." [...] > >Spoon discusses the infamous Georgia patch from the >2002 election. "I've personally reviewed a number of >pieces of code from Diebold. It's garbage. Some of the >code is awful. I reviewed the patch that they put in >Georgia, 2002, that many of them claimed is a clock >function. It's not a clock function, it's a comparator >function. … If it were me and I were to guess what >that code is, it's a vote flipping code. It's not a >clock function, that I know." > >Interviewer: So this is not a partisan issue? > >Spoonamore: It shouldn't be. This is a fascist issue. >People who don't want voting and want fascist control >but have people think they're voting. I mean, people >forget the fact there was voting in Hitler's Germany. >Guess what? He won with 90% of the vote all the time. >There was voting in Saddam's Iraq. And guess what? >Saddam won the vote all the time. Well, did they win? >Was that actually the will of the voter? Was that the >way the votes were even cast?... Do you want to have a >system in place where there is a permanent background >of electronic voting fraud of 2-and-a-half percent? >That means you have to win an election by a minimum of >3% to know that you've won? I don't. Paper ballots, >please. That's the only thing that can be secure. > >Interviewer: [Regarding the Harri Hursti hack] Diebold >has come back every time and said, "Well, you know, >that hack can't happen." > >Spoonamore: They're lying. They're lying. Diebold is >lying. > >"I think they [the Diebold machines] are brilliantly >designed. They're designed to steal elections. … There >are back doors in the tabulations machines, which is >what the US-CERT warning is about. There's a backdoor >communication that allows secondary computers to talk >to the actual tabulators electronically from a >distance." Spoon goes on to describe some of the >technical details of electronic voting machine >election fraud. > >"We have had numerous elections in this country now in >which -- where you use Diebold Election System >machines -- that what happens with the vote is way >off, five, ten, as much as twelve percent from the >exit polling and the actual survey. These statistical >numbers are impossible. > >And the problem is Americans do not want to believe >that we have people stealing our elections. And they >must come to the realization there are people in this >country who want to steal elections, and we must stop >them"

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.