Friday, May 2, 2008 - New servers are in! Click-in for more info!
VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:53:26 08/26/08 Tue
Author: (signed: MJD)
Subject: okay...eye just wanna hit a few things, real quick

first...the "people (who say they) are gonna vote for McStain"-argument:

what better/quicker "way" to REALLY bring about change in this country..than to re-install the GOPee party, to what many detractors see as "the (potential) end of the United States"? Personally...at this time, eye'm gonna vote for Nader or McKinney, myself...but the original statement stands.

second...the "Clinton screwed up domestic oil"-argument:

THERE IS NO OIL SHORTAGE...the last person on this planet will choke, gasp and die from the byproducts of oil-use LONG BEFORE "anybody runs out"..

third...what is the difference between Hillary supporters, any other voter(s), whose candidate didn't make the cut?

None whatsoever..if you don't get the candidate you want, find another..or don't vote. In the nature of "spite" refer to the first-item on this list/post.

There are people (perhaps (ex)-Hillary supporters and others) who (still) have qualms/doubts about the "come-from-nowhere" aspect of Barak Obama's candidacy...there are those who (might) say, "Baraks the younger one, it was up to him to, 'wait his turn'". (Note: whether YOU want to "see" this reason as a blatent admission that it WAS Hillary's "TURN" or that, the simple truth of American social culture was/is, a (qualified) white woman was gonna be elected, before the 1st qualified black man (or woman) - is up to you. But eye will remind (some of) you again...the "establishment" that has the MOST TO LOSE from the (whatever it ends up being) "change" heralded by Obama gravitated to him, and not her (Hillary)...that, and the still considerable (what eye call) unnatural hatred and dissention (fear - of her - quotient?) towards (both) the Clintons, clearly made HER the "ANTI-establishment candidate" whom, in (some of) the minds of anyone paying attention had the most to "change" TO the establishment and the establishment, had the MOST TO FEAR - from.

All of this, aside...Nader's words (still) say it best:

If the democrat party can't win THIS ELECTION, they need to disappear and come back (if possible) as - something else.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-3
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.