VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:13:57 07/14/08 Mon
Author: Let them wear what they want, whether conservative or "blinged-up". Glad to see the numbers staying up as they get older, they're great to watch.
Subject: I have to say I dislike the term "real boy". They're all our real boys and it goes without saying they're much loved regardless of orientation.
In reply to: more inside 's message, "Other than some gel in their hair and bling on the vests, I really didn't see much over-the-top for the boys. It does seem to be the trend." on 09:29:16 07/14/08 Mon


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> I was the one who said "real boy" and I certainly meant no offencse - just that real boys are boys and they like all sorts of things - has absolutely nothing to do with orientation, which is a ridiculous discussion to start with and has NOTHING to do with dance - simply meant boys are boys -- and each are individuals, 19:05:35 07/14/08 Mon [1]

this arena is not a place for any discussion of "orientation" -


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> but your reference to "real boys" did raise another discussion-it is completely derogotory towards males who may have differing perceptions of their genders-biologically they are real boys-such a stupid label -- and very offensive/judgemental, 05:58:59 07/16/08 Wed [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.