Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師，nelson最好 -- 九濟堂 SFXC forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sat December 21, 2024 23:15:06

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師，nelson最好

Author:
狗神

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:35:29 08/16/09 Sun
In reply to: 人 's message, "Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師，nelson最好" on 00:04:40 08/16/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答�
>�
>>!
>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派
>?>X
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大‧又難係嚴肅‧乜都揸正黎�
>�
>>�
>>>E
>>>>�
>>>>>n
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>同意，不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢？不可以是form1,fo
>r
>>m
>>>2
>>>>,
>>>>>f
>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>m3嗎？一定是E班嗎？希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才�
>U
>>�
>>>P
>>>>�
>>>>>_
>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>咁又係，你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分，勁人
>>>
>>>
>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>
>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>
>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>30分大晒咩!!
>教得唔好就唔好教la

nelson教得最好

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師，nelson最好

Author:
old boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:40:47 09/01/09 Tue

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答
>�
>>�
>>>!
>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前�
>�
>>?>X
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大‧又難係嚴肅‧乜都揸正黎
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>E
>>>>>�
>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>同意，不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢？不可以是form1,f
>o
>>r
>>>m
>>>>2
>>>>>,
>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>m3嗎？一定是E班嗎？希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才
>�
>>U
>>>�
>>>>P
>>>>>�
>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>咁又係，你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分，勁人
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>
>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>
>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>30分大晒咩!!
>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>
>nelson教得最好

Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in his lessons.

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師，nelson最好

Author:
Current Boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:51:27 09/04/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人?>?>>�
>>>�
>>>>!
>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前
>�
>>�
>>>?>X
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大‧又難係嚴肅‧乜都揸正?>?>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>E
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>同意，不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢？不可以是form1,
>f
>>o
>>>r
>>>>m
>>>>>2
>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎？一定是E班嗎？希望校友和同學們可以想清楚?>~
>>�
>>>U
>>>>�
>>>>>P
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>咁又係，你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分，勁人
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>
>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>
>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>
>>nelson教得最好
>
>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>his lessons.

Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on that topic.

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Nelson Fung一定是最好的老師，nelson最好

Author:
講手王
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:00:59 09/24/09 Thu

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人
>?>?>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>!
>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之�
>e
>>�
>>>�
>>>>?>X
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大‧又難係嚴肅‧乜都揸正
>?>?>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>E
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>同意，不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢？不可以是form1
>,
>>f
>>>o
>>>>r
>>>>>m
>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎？一定是E班嗎？希望校友和同學們可以想清楚
>?>~
>>>�
>>>>U
>>>>>�
>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>咁又係，你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分，勁人
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>>
>>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>>
>>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>>
>>>nelson教得最好
>>
>>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>>his lessons.
>
>
>Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to
>learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on
>that topic.

佢教數教得勁好,生動,又concept勁

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: miss chung著衫有d出位...

Author:
新人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:29:23 11/08/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>>>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的�
>H
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之
>�
>>e
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>?>X
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大‧又難係嚴肅‧乜都揸�
>�
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>E
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>同意，不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢？不可以是form
>1
>>,
>>>f
>>>>o
>>>>>r
>>>>>>m
>>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎？一定是E班嗎？希望校友和同學們可以想清�
>�
>>?>~
>>>>�
>>>>>U
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>咁又係，你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分，勁人
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>>>
>>>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>>>
>>>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>>>
>>>>nelson教得最好
>>>
>>>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>>>his lessons.
>>
>>
>>Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to
>>learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on
>>that topic.
>
>
>佢教數教得勁好,生動,又concept勁

miss chung著衫有d出位...算唔算有問題?