The rationale behind SFX Wall -- 九濟堂 SFXC forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sun December 22, 2024 18:05:39

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: The rationale behind SFX Wall

Author:
No.3_Lam

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:17:20 09/22/08 Mon
In reply to: 空有計謀的革命份子 's message, "Re: 九濟堂很冷淡, 大家莫非已棄絕九濟堂?" on 00:37:54 09/22/08 Mon

As I know, the first SFX Wall is organized in the year 2003-04. The organizing committee, which is the SU cabinet and the teacher advisors, would like to differentiate SFX Wall from come.to/sfxc.

You may notice that the online forum of come.to/sfxc is an open forum which everyone of us can write dowm whatever you like without any responsibility, and so, the school authority bears no duty to reply any post here.

However, in SFX Wall, since it is an official discussion board, the school authority is requested by the Student Union to give response. You can see the difference is there exists an organization, the Student Union, to monitor the Wall.

Of course, the monitor role of SU is just a temporary solution. The ultimate goal of SFX Wall, or at least in the heart of the path-finder, is to cultivate a self-disciplined culture like the university, where students can post anything freely on the board. The only requirement is to leave their student numbers.

I don't know how's the development of SFX Wall nowadays as I have graduated for several years. In my opinion, there are always controversial policies for discussion. Try to remember how many times do you talk about SFXC / Mr. Yuen / the vice-principals in a week and you will understand even a F.1 boy can write down a lot of suggestions. The crucial point is whether the SU takes up the responsibilty to request for reply on current issues.

I think, the fall of come.to/sfxc is because of the lack of "meaningful reply" from heartwarming teachers.

No one loves to speak to air, so try to get the involvement from the school authority and I believe there will be more and more open-minded and fruitful discussion.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: Re: The rationale behind SFX Wall

Author:
漁工水師
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:12:12 09/22/08 Mon

>As I know, the first SFX Wall is organized in the year
>2003-04. The organizing committee, which is the SU
>cabinet and the teacher advisors, would like to
>differentiate SFX Wall from come.to/sfxc.
>
>You may notice that the online forum of come.to/sfxc
>is an open forum which everyone of us can write dowm
>whatever you like without any responsibility, and so,
>the school authority bears no duty to reply any post
>here.
>
>However, in SFX Wall, since it is an official
>discussion board, the school authority is requested by
>the Student Union to give response. You can see the
>difference is there exists an organization, the
>Student Union, to monitor the Wall.
>
>Of course, the monitor role of SU is just a temporary
>solution. The ultimate goal of SFX Wall, or at least
>in the heart of the path-finder, is to cultivate a
>self-disciplined culture like the university, where
>students can post anything freely on the board. The
>only requirement is to leave their student numbers.
>
>I don't know how's the development of SFX Wall
>nowadays as I have graduated for several years. In my
>opinion, there are always controversial policies for
>discussion. Try to remember how many times do you talk
>about SFXC / Mr. Yuen / the vice-principals in a week
>and you will understand even a F.1 boy can write down
>a lot of suggestions. The crucial point is whether the
>SU takes up the responsibilty to request for reply on
>current issues.
>
>I think, the fall of come.to/sfxc is because of the
>lack of "meaningful reply" from heartwarming teachers.
>
>No one loves to speak to air, so try to get the
>involvement from the school authority and I believe
>there will be more and more open-minded and fruitful
>discussion.
浩三兄，時移勢易，學校害怕有ASU，但也可能更害怕有「盡責」的學生會呀