Criminal Breach of Trust -- Jessy Hoh Chui Lee No.KPT: 721123-01-5086 KP: A2308246

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:49:42 05/06/08 Tue
Author: Jessy Hoh Chui Lee (Cheating , Breach of Promise)
Subject: Criminal Breach of Trust
In reply to: Jessy Hoh Chui Lee 's message, "Missing Person Jessy Hoh Chui Lee" on 17:47:05 05/06/08 Tue

BREACH OF TRUST - The wilful misappropriation, by a trustee, of a thing which had been lawfully delivered to him in confidence.

The distinction between larceny and a breach of trust is to be found chiefly in the terms or way in which the thing was taken originally into the party's possession; and the rule seems to be that whenever the article is obtained upon a fair contract, not for a mere temporary purpose or by one who is in the employment of the deliverer, then the subsequent misappropriation is to be considered as an act of breach of trust.

This rule is, however, subject to many nice distinctions. It has been adjudged that when the owner of goods parts with the possession for a particular purpose, and the person who receives them avowedly for that purpose, has at the time a fraudulent intention to make use of the possession as the weans of converting the goods to his own use and does so convert them, it is larceny; but if the owner part with the property, although fraudulent means have been used to obtain it, the act of conversion is not larceny.

Website - http://www.lectlaw.com/def/b112.htm

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Con-woman from Segamat , Johor Baru! -- Jessy Hoh Chui Lee (CBT , Cheating , Breach of ...), 17:54:21 05/06/08 Tue