[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
I have to totally disagree!From my own experience: I work in 4 states including the one I live in and I have competed in all 4 over the years. I own land in 2, grew up in the third for 18 years and the 4th one I competed only once in that state. As a LOCAL titleholder in EVERY state I worked in, I made MORE appearances than the majority of other titleholders in my "adopted" state than people who LIVED THERE!! So what is their excuse?? This happens in MAO all the time as well. Perfect example, I lost in one of these states to the winner who later won nationals. As a local queen she made ZERO appearances, as a state winner about TWO and nationally not many more than that. I did MORE as a local winner 400 miles away than she did with two consecutive titles she didn't have to set two feet out her door to represent! Sorry, if the rules don't restrict qualification by residency (such as Mrs America), then its unfair to discriminate. I'd do a better job than many "natives" and have before.