VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

14/06/26 3:10am [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 4/07/20 12:35pm
Author: tenderWARRIOR
Subject: Most if not all have between 14-17 talls according to the Balance List Sheet.
In reply to: John 's message, "Then.." on 4/07/20 9:52am

It is just come coaches have better players in better positions. That is pretty fundamental to the game.

And re McKernan, if you have cap limits he loses value, not gain it. A 3rd or 4th for McKernan is about right. Expecting a 1st in any scenario is absurd.

If he has more value to you than a 3rd or 4th pick, then you keep him. Win/Win. Both coaches get to keep what they value most...

The issue is not "stockpiling talls". Every list has a heap. If you want a better one, draft or trade one in. That is pretty much the point of the game.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.