| Subject: Re: Supremacy or Superiority? |
Author:
bim
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 00:14:48 09/08/10 Wed
In reply to:
Liz
's message, "Re: Supremacy or Superiority?" on 13:24:26 09/05/10 Sun
I do not believe in the superiority of a sex, but rather that sexes complement each other. I also believe in the importance of roles.
The physical differences does not indicate superiority but complementation. Another complementation is that women are better incentives, while men are better initiatives. This may not necessarily be genetic but rather social; i don't know; but most of the differences are nurtured.
Most people are neither pure doms nor pure subs. Most people are doms sometimes or in some aspects, and subs otherwise. That is most people are switches, and this is an essential aspect to understand about humans.
Most female-led relations that are successful are those where there is separations of roles. He might be sub to her in some things, while maybe dominant in his job. This conforms with the "switch" nature of most people. Most other female-led relations that do not take this into account fail. Even the dominant wives themselves become uninterested and seek cuckolding, or other dominant partners.
Being submissive is not something wrong to be ashmed of. This is an essential part of the self freedom. Nobody is a real dom if he/she is not free. He/she must be free to live the submissive side as well as the dominant side. Most dominant women, honestly speaking, fear to admit before men their submissive side. Most also do not have sexual freedom. I have never seen a woman who picks one or two men at a bar for sex.
I promote femdom from my belief in indifferences and androgyny (but i need to point at the failures).
bim
>Personally, I don't see one gender as wholly superior
>or inferior to the other.
>Each gender has its strengths and weaknesses. Males
>are genetically designed to be the more physical
>gender. You'd have to go and change our species to
>alter this. (yes, there are exceptions, but that's
>what they are - exceptions - not the norm).
>While males are predisposed to physical labor, females
>are better suited to decision making roles.
>If you just look at female lead marriages, those are
>the ones where both partners are happiest, there's
>less conflict, and thus, the family as a whole is
>better off.
>Men who serve their wives or girlfriends are happier
>than those that don't have that opportunity.
>Unfortunately, most men are too stupid to realize this
>and are unwilling to accept a female lead. Women can
>make their mates happy if they would just take the
>lead and steer the relationship in that direction
>(either overtly or covertly).
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 