Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Saturday, September 07, 06:35:24pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: terse answers Author: Damoclese [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 04/ 6/04 7:41pm In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "...explain yourself." on 04/ 6/04 10:50am >> >>You should be thinking about limits and what limits >>definitionally represent for this conversation. > >Indeed, that's what I think Damoclese was thinking >about. For instance, the series 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + >1/16 ... eventually approaches a finite number (2) as >we go to infinity. Nonetheless, this has no relevance >to any of the premises in the Tristram Shandy argument, Because adding years successively doesn't necessarily yield an infinity. Hence, if Shandy were writing for an infinte amount of time, there is nothing to prevent him from coverging on done without ever actually getting done at least as regards calculus. >which I suspect is why he declined to >elucidate further when I asked him what calculus has >to do with it. Actually, I grew weary of explaining every nuance of what I meant. As pretentious as it sounds, I don't like dealing with people who aren't willing to make half an intellectual effort to understand the points made. I simply have better ways to spend my all too finite time. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Succinct replies. Wade A. Tisthammer 04/ 7/04 11:48pm That's what I'm talking about -- Damoclese, 04/ 8/04 7:44am Really? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/ 8/04 10:07am Watch this -- Damoclese, 04/ 8/04 10:29am I'm watching. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/11/04 9:38pm and oh yeah -- damoclese, 04/ 8/04 10:51am Oh yeah! Kool Aid for everyone! -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/11/04 9:48pm Assuming -- Damoclese, 04/12/04 8:25am Infinity. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/12/04 10:25am heh -- Damoclese, 04/12/04 11:14am Tee hee. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/12/04 4:47pm "one" -- Damoclese, 04/12/04 6:56pm Two -- Wade A. Tishtammer, 04/14/04 1:06pm What's good for the goose -- Damoclese, 04/14/04 5:04pm What other alternatives are there? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/15/04 11:37am Ganders -- Damoclese, 04/15/04 5:36pm Why abandon logic? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/28/04 12:14pm Hiatus over -- Damoclese, 04/28/04 6:53pm Illogical to abandon logic. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/29/04 12:47pm what a bounty -- Damoclese, 04/29/04 2:25pm Of logic. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 05/ 2/04 3:11pm of intuition -- Damoclese, 05/ 4/04 10:51am Of more logic. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 05/ 7/04 2:25pm One mistake... -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/15/04 11:40am