Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Thursday, October 17, 08:52:44pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: What about it? Author: Wade A. Tisthammer [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 06/15/04 11:20pm In reply to: QUITTNER 's message, "Inerrancy???" on 06/11/04 1:26pm >>>> doesn't tarnish the claim of inerrancy regarding >the original autographs. <<< >..... The originals are no longer available. True, but irrelevant. One can still claim that the originals were inerrant and that the surviving copies, while having near perfect accuracy to the originals, may suffer from a few copyist errors. >>>> This is awfully generally. Would you care to be >more specific? <<< >..... Jesus required all sorts of things from >disciples. But his teachings are not OBEYED by the >many people who SAY that they are following Jesus. For >example, the Ten Commandments are not being obeyed, >nor is "The Golden Rule". >..... As I keep repeating, those who claim that their >scriptures are from God, and that there is inerrancy, >then these SAME people are REQUIRED to OBEY at all >times everywhere what God has commanded/required, and >they are NOT free to pick and choose what they will, >or will not obey. It’s called free will dude. They are free to do the wrong thing even if they shouldn't do it. Exactly how does this affect the issue of Biblical inerrancy? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Obeying a requirement? QUITTNER 06/25/04 11:29am What about it? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 07/13/04 9:11pm Enforcing laws of religion -- QUITTNER, 07/16/04 2:03pm Skeptic's Annotated Bible - Corrected and Explained -- Jason Gastrich, 08/ 2/04 4:05am Subject: Enforcing laws of religion -- QUITTNER, 08/ 6/04 2:23pm