| Subject: Tis true |
Author:
Damoclese
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 08/16/04 1:37pm
In reply to:
Duane
's message, "Tristam Shandy Exposed!" on 08/16/04 1:30am
>
>Well, actually, the simplest way to explain away this
>apparent paradox is the following:
>
>If the total distance travelled == 1, then Zeno's
>description of motion describes the summation of
>
> 1/(2^n)
>
>from n=1 to n=(infinity), which is a "summable
>series." (whose sum is, incidentally, 1)
I certainly don't disagree with any of this, as this problem is of a class of problems that very elementary calculus disposes of quite neatly as you've done here.
>
>But your point is well made, that infinite series,
>sets, etc. make for many apparent paradoxes, and that
>in a sort-of hand-wavy, non-rigorous way, you might
>say that, "If your paradox involves infinity, you're
>probably just being clever, and it really isn't a
>paradox."
Precisely. Infinity begets paradoxes.
>
>I think your example clearly illustrates how Tristam
>Shandy falls into the same class of paradox.
>
>Duane
I'm glad at least someone did. I was beginning to think that my powers of communication had been gravely altered.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
