You're right you ragamuffin -- Ben's Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Saturday, September 07, 06:31:34pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: You're right you ragamuffin

Author:
Damoclese

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03/19/04 12:56pm
In reply to: Ben 's message, "This is how it seems to me" on 03/19/04 11:18am

>
>
>Perhaps it would help for Damoclese to admit that
>Wade's argument is sound, which I think he believes,
>but to clarify that this does not create in him a need
>to believe that this must be true in reality.

You little ruffian you. I think Wade's argument is abstractly true in a logical context where the nature of reality is toggled off.

A beginngless task however, I find to be compeletly illogical, inasfar as humans and reality are concerned, and as logic was and is set up primarily to deal with reality, I think it fails to be useful or compelling.

So you are pretty much right, at least from my standpoint.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Logic terminology.	Wade A. Tisthammer	03/20/04 1:09pm