Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ] |
| Subject: Re: Eyes Wide Open | |
Author: Princess Running Water | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 20:36:02 09/18/11 Sun In reply to: M 's message, "Re: Eyes Wide Open" on 14:26:57 09/16/11 Fri You are right the original restrictions would be fine, but that's NOT what this SBPOA is trying to do. Read their PROPOSED Deed Restrictions. VERY different story, and as far as the property owners that were sued, One of them was sued for just inquiring about dividing his lots, he actually did NOTHING. The other, put up RV's on his lots and rents them out. Pretty darn nice ones too.. no pig farm there! As to subdividing lots.. take a long look at that one. It's been done over the years by several property owners and when it comes out in court just who did most of that, there'll be a lot egg on the SBPOA faces. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Eyes Wide Open | |
|
Author: M [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 15:41:39 10/24/11 Mon Actually if action was taken not in accordance with the deed restrictions of 1954 it could raise title clouds on the offenders or buyers from the offenders. [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |