VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12/ 3/15 11:51:04pm Thu
Author: Raider Archivist
Subject: USCHO article on Belfast's Varied Beneficiaries
In reply to: Steve 's message, "Re: It's "Opprobrium" Steve!" on 12/ 1/15 10:26:49am Tue

A good read: http://www.uscho.com/2015/12/03/umass-lowell-gets-the-hardware-at-the-friendship-four-but-the-real-victor-is-college-hockey/



>>>But, you're right on, nonetheless!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>There is nothing to "be argued" and it's not up to
>>>>others to supply funding information for the Belfast
>>>>tournament or the new arena for that manner. Just
>>look
>>>>it all up yourself.
>>>>
>>>>And before you go about insulting Colgate teams and
>>>>social workers with your invective think about
>taking
>>>>a deep breath, vent and ponder the likely
>>>>consequences. A little effort and balance on your
>>part
>>>>can go a long way in avoiding approbrium.
>>>>
>>>>Like I said yesterday, stop digging and move on
>>>>already. OK?
>>>>
>>>>Go 'gate!
>>
>>Invective? Approbrium? My apologies for being a
>>social worker who used taxpayer bucks to attend a
>>state school rather than a social worker who attended
>>an overpriced private college, but "invective" and
>>"approbrium" in a single rant? I'm humbled and
>>humiliated. By the way, why can't I find the latter of
>>those two words in the dictionary?
>
>
>There is no need to apologize for your background!
>
>The earlier poster is correct in that I mistyped and
>thereby misspelled opprobrium. I may have been
>thinking of "Approval" which one might reasonably
>expect to earn when contributing on this site-
>something others might approve of, agree with and
>appreciate. No, not a rant, just a viewpoint or maybe
>a suggestion.
>
>Anyway, now that you are using the words invective and
>opprobrium you have more arrows in your quiver.
>Nothing wrong with that, is there?
>
>Go 'gate!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.