VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10/ 6/15 11:52:59am Tue
Author: Colgate W B-BALL Supporter BOO!!! (Well-said!!)
Subject: Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn?
In reply to: Gate Raider 's message, "Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn?" on 10/ 5/15 4:15:23pm Mon

>I think this is expressed accurately and very-well.

For perhaps 20-30 grand as the up-side, the strong negative PR statement makes the "premium" a short-sighted, narrow decision.

And by the way, Bison and others are correct. the motivation/decision for the 'premium" was on the Colgate side. Can't blame Gino or UCONN.

............just something to remember when there are less then 100 bodies in the gym for a women's game come January, and something I will remember when I am again asked to contribute to Triple /Double "to help build thewomen's b-ball pgrm."

Again, at risk of being redundant, a bad job by Colgate here.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn? -- High Five, 10/ 6/15 2:04:23pm Tue

>>I think this is expressed accurately and very-well.
>
>For perhaps 20-30 grand as the up-side, the strong
>negative PR statement makes the "premium" a
>short-sighted, narrow decision.
>
>And by the way, Bison and others are correct. the
>motivation/decision for the 'premium" was on the
>Colgate side. Can't blame Gino or UCONN.
>
>............just something to remember when there are
>less then 100 bodies in the gym for a women's game
>come January, and something I will remember when I am
>again asked to contribute to Triple /Double "to help
>build thewomen's b-ball pgrm."
>
>Again, at risk of being redundant, a bad job by
>Colgate here.

I feel for the ticket person, imagine they are taking all the bullets on this one, which doesn't surprise me.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.