VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10/ 8/15 6:51:08pm Thu
Author: gate
Subject: Re: Colgate v. Princeton
In reply to: Gate Raider 's message, "Colgate v. Princeton" on 10/ 7/15 11:45:58pm Wed

On their web site I see that Princeton is playing Gtown in 2016 but can only find San Diego for 2017 and no Davidson. Davidson was 1-11 last year and is 0-4 this season, dear God.

http://www.goprincetontigers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=10600&ATCLID=301038

I wonder if the Smith College professor who criticized Colgate's new athletic facility and is not an advocate for spending on new athletic facilities with little or no return has any opinion on Gtown's donation ;-)

As for the Princeton game, we have difficulty defending the pass, especially toward the sidelines. Control the clock and even a FG in the red zone instead of a TD would be helpful rather than leaving missed points on the field. Our penalties have subsided a bit and that is growth. Also don't think P'ton's competition thus far has been impressive. The Raiders are a better test.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Re: Colgate v. Princeton -- Gate Raider, 10/10/15 12:43:09am Sat

Where's the kicking game. I was expecting Bowman to be playing a bigger part in the offense. Some say he has become distracted - a girl friend. His performance last year was somewhat of a comfort. Hope he and the O line gets back on track for the kick game.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Colgate v. Princeton -- Frank Zappa, 10/10/15 9:01:05am Sat

>Where's the kicking game. I was expecting Bowman to
>be playing a bigger part in the offense. Some say he
>has become distracted - a girl friend. His
>performance last year was somewhat of a comfort. Hope
>he and the O line gets back on track for the kick game.


He has a serious testosterone deficiency !


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Colgate v. Princeton -- Steve, 10/10/15 9:54:23am Sat

>>Where's the kicking game. I was expecting Bowman to
>>be playing a bigger part in the offense. Some say he
>>has become distracted - a girl friend. His
>>performance last year was somewhat of a comfort. Hope
>>he and the O line gets back on track for the kick
>game.
>
>
>He has a serious testosterone deficiency !


Yeah, right.

Blame the girfriend for the kicking game! That should do it.

Go 'gate!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Colgate v. Princeton -- get 'em gate, 10/10/15 11:03:35am Sat

>>>Where's the kicking game. I was expecting Bowman to
>>>be playing a bigger part in the offense. Some say he
>>>has become distracted - a girl friend. His
>>>performance last year was somewhat of a comfort.
>Hope
>>>he and the O line gets back on track for the kick
>>game.
>>
>>
>>He has a serious testosterone deficiency !
>
>
>Yeah, right.
>
>Blame the girfriend for the kicking game! That should
>do it.
>
>Go 'gate!

Two of the three last missed kicks were blocked on the D side of the line. Seems like a fundamental to be avoided in the first place by coaching technique and prevented with instruction in the future.

Could be a big win today for Gate. May need several blitz packages. With a QB rating of 139.7 Princeton can't be allowed to call their own shots. Gate O coming into its own and its receivers could have a big day and in the process open opportunities for Holland on whom Princeton will key.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.