[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10/ 5/15 1:05:24pm Mon
Author: womensb-ball supporter BOOOOO!!!!!!!!! (Colgate got this wrong)
Subject: Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn?
In reply to:
Swing Low
's message, "Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn?" on 10/ 5/15 12:36:05pm Mon
I am reading from our bison contributor that UCONN and Gino had no role in setting our "premium" price and that UCONN in fact, is NOT getting a huge guarantee for coming to Hamilton. As many have stated, the UCONN motivation is playing a game nearby her home for their senior superstar BS. While I belive that Bison is correct, I am going to check on this. And I will absolutely voice my specific complaints to Mike H - who has done a great job chairing Athletics on the BOT, as well as to AMG and VC.
In bigger scheme of things, I have contributed to Triple-Double in hopes of building/up-lifting the womens basketball pgrm. Bigger Picture oriented towards creating/building something for the future. That is an on-going process. Premium for UCONN does not help that building process. We are missing real opportunity with locals to try and gain a few more followers/potential fans. And if anyone has been to Colgate women's basketball home games, everyone would grasp that gaining even an additional 10-20 consistent, loyal home fans per game would move the needle. Building home attendence has to start somewhere - and this is a missed opportunity.
I am someone who can afford the $25 - but I absolutely understand that that admission ticket is expensive in the Hamilton NY area for some "locals." And as previously stated, the "premium" likely will discourage some potentially "curious" locals from attending.
Bad Job Colgate!!!
(From an existing w-basketball contributor and supporter).
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn? -- Gate Raider, 10/ 5/15 4:15:23pm Mon
I have come around to the point where I am not disturbed by the $25 price. This is a game UConn wanted to play in the local area for BS. They aren't playing the game to benefit Colgate. Syracuse would not accommodate UConn. It is being played more for Syracuse folks than local Hamilton/Colgate fans. I can't see being totally beat by UConn as a boost for 'gate WBB. I don't think that local Hamilton fans care at all about UConn and they are not stupid. I suspect they realize that it is money maker for Colgate with the money coming from Syracuse.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn? -- Townie Perspective, 10/ 6/15 11:05:03am Tue
>I don't think that local Hamilton fans care at all about UConn and they are not stupid.
I live just outside of Hamilton.
You may be underestimating the opportunity this is for locals. Many of us cannot afford taking the family to a game at the Dome (nevermind seeing the Giants, Bills, Mets, Yankees, etc.). Our chance to see national-class athletics is on the Colgate campus. We go to football games even during bad weather and difficult seasons (which appears not to be true of the many Colgate students). When no one else is in town for the basketball, hockey, softball, lacrosse, etc., you'll see us there.
You could argue, of course, that Colgate owes us nothing (debatable, given the "non-profit" status of a $800M enterprise that has property off the property tax and school tax rolls in a county that is economically challenged). Yet if you treat us as if we do not have value, you will see even emptier stands in December and January (nevermind the fact that often there are more of in the stands for a football game than there are students!).
All decisions have costs and benefits. I hope Director Chun and her staff have thought hard about the statement this is making to locals who have supported Colgate athletics at times when faculty, staff and administrators have been less enthusiastic.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn? -- Colgate W B-BALL Supporter BOO!!! (Well-said!!), 10/ 6/15 11:52:59am Tue
>I think this is expressed accurately and very-well.
For perhaps 20-30 grand as the up-side, the strong negative PR statement makes the "premium" a short-sighted, narrow decision.
And by the way, Bison and others are correct. the motivation/decision for the 'premium" was on the Colgate side. Can't blame Gino or UCONN.
............just something to remember when there are less then 100 bodies in the gym for a women's game come January, and something I will remember when I am again asked to contribute to Triple /Double "to help build thewomen's b-ball pgrm."
Again, at risk of being redundant, a bad job by Colgate here.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: WBB: $25 for the home game vs UConn? -- High Five, 10/ 6/15 2:04:23pm Tue
>>I think this is expressed accurately and very-well.
>
>For perhaps 20-30 grand as the up-side, the strong
>negative PR statement makes the "premium" a
>short-sighted, narrow decision.
>
>And by the way, Bison and others are correct. the
>motivation/decision for the 'premium" was on the
>Colgate side. Can't blame Gino or UCONN.
>
>............just something to remember when there are
>less then 100 bodies in the gym for a women's game
>come January, and something I will remember when I am
>again asked to contribute to Triple /Double "to help
>build thewomen's b-ball pgrm."
>
>Again, at risk of being redundant, a bad job by
>Colgate here.
I feel for the ticket person, imagine they are taking all the bullets on this one, which doesn't surprise me.
[ Edit | View ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]
Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
