Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

Subject: well..... Author: Kari Krinklet [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 19:45:05 04/10/01 Tue In reply to: Alih 's message, "Hmmmm..." on 15:42:01 04/10/01 Tue You guy, I'm sure, don't get the Chicago Sun-Times, but the newspaper talked about the Rev. Jesse Jackson's point-of-view. I agree with him. From the newspaper--"Jackson also said the United States ought to apologize for what was and unintentional act and China should recognize the mid-air collision that led to the loss of a Chinese pilot was an accident. "I think our government should say,'If we have violated you in any way, it was not intentional and we apologize,'" he said. "getting Americans home is worth expressing an apology."" There was also a column in the newspaper titled, "China not earning many gold medals." "If the servicemen and women are not freed, the United States should declare its opposition to China's bid for the 2008 Olympics. Beijing would do well to remember that it was the considerable U.S. influence in 1993 that nixed China as the site of the 2000 Olympics." I agree with both articles. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Checkerpaw 08:24:04 04/11/01 Wed Breaking News: It doesn't matter now, since we apologized. (NT) -- Alih, 12:35:41 04/11/01 Wed I say... -- Kari Krinklet, 14:05:04 04/11/01 Wed well -- fergsth, 15:44:10 04/11/01 Wed