Name (optional):

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
> - >http://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/dec/23/spanish-po >lice-arrest-fbi-most-wanted-fugitive > >>In Heather Deep #2 Rochelle Kavanaugh, claims to have >>been, sex trafficked. Ms Kavanaugh claims she was >>confined in her own home, and forced to make, “Found >>here” ONLY FANS content. Rochelle’s complaint to >>Osceola county Florida’s Already pissed off >>Sheriffs, Judges, and neighbors, Levied Human >>Trafficking charges brought just in time for >>Christmas, of course, yes by TWO wives. FYI, Equally >>important, the first wife, The Real Heather Deep trial >>ended with a full-blown acquittal. >> >>rachelle maquiniana kavanaugh... dockside marine inc. >>- ck transporting inc. >> >>Noelleaks.com is no longer owned by Donny >> - >>http://www.noelleaks.com/noelleaks-com-is-no-longer-ow >n >>ed-by-donny/ >> >>Posted on November 24, 2023 >>by Anonymous Poster >> >>For legal reasons and lack of ability to be able to >>pay for upkeep Noelleaks.com and many other websites >>ownership have been transferred to a person overseas >>in a country that is immune to USA court orders and US >>laws. >> >>This will ensure that corrupt judge Holly N Derenthal >>cannot take this site or others from Donny. For those >>that didn’t know Donny’s hundreds of other >>websites already had been moved years ago because he >>couldn’t pay for them anymore after his wife falsely >>accused him and he was forced to delete all content >>with her. >> >>Its funny because his stupid worthless Thai whore wife >>and her stupid corrupt feminist man hating lawyers >>Jennier Jane Watson and Sara Vance THINK there is a >>adult internet business that Donny’s still profits >>from but they are in for a big surprise. >> >>DONNY DOESN’T OWN ANYTHING ANYMORE! Accept WINNING >>LOL >> >>donald carlos seoane typical M.O. he owns it. we know >>it. >> >>Porn Wikileaks Founder Donny Long AKA Donald Seoane, >>Finds Heather Deep #2, a wealthy as hell Widow set for >>an Inheritance of 3.4 MILLION but trying for 11 >>MILLION. Now in a court battle for the extra 7.6 Mill >> >>Rochelle Kavanaugh a Widow. Ms Kavanaugh’s husband >>passed away during the pandemic of COVID 19. Mr >>Kavanaugh was just 47 years old and owned a yacht >>sales and repair business. At Issue was his estate, at >>over 11 Million plus, being set to be left for >>inheritance. Donny Sealed his fate, with Rochelle, a >>member of the Lonely Hearts Club, Kavanaugh ” a >>mail-order bride from the Philippines”. They have a >>6 month old baby boy. Dear god help us all- >> >>3 counts. he hs four children. 1 his oldestt daughter >>he brang to the usa from thailand. he claims his ex >>wife gave him custody and removed him from her life. >>thailand authorities need to check into this she is >>now around 12 or 13 years old. >> >>2 children are from his second wife nantita seoane >>also from thailand. a girl and a boy 6 and 4 years >old. >> >>last: a filipino woman and she had a new born around 6 >>to 8 months old. her name was >> >>Donnys Puka Chain atReply >>LOL WOW. >> >>Bout damn time! Nice throw back quote NL >> >>CJ >>Great News Luke . Glad the law finally caught up to >him >> >>Pingback: An Interesting Donny Long Update >>#humantrafficking - suckleonthis.com >> >>Thomas >>It’s nice to see justice catching up with this guy. >>Nice write up >> >>dprzygoda >>donny long busted for human trafficking and sex >>slavery… he meets 3rd world ladies… marries >>them… forces them to make porn videos he exploits on >>onlyfans… he is sick and he’s using his own kids >>as a weapon against florida authorities… he is a >>mentally deranged pos. he actually has 4 kids by 3 >>separate females. when you impregnate a woman and make >>her have children that’s pretty sad and pathetic… >>what charge is that? donald carlos sroane never >learns. >> >>DPRZYGODA >>SEX SLAVES ARE FORCED TO HAVE CHILDREN SO CAPTOR CAN >>EXPLOIT THEM. TRULY SICK. >> >>angelo ganopoulos >>human sex trafficking is the charge. forcing a woman >>to have a baby is seriously sick and demented. that >>has to be federal civil rights violation… slavery, >>kidnapping, see… >> >>edward przydzial sent in a brief here: >> >>International law. This definition shall not in any >>way be interpreted as affecting national >>laws relating to pregnancy. >>Since 1998, more than 120 states have ratified the ICC >>Statute, thereby accepting its definition of >>crimes against humanity and war crimes. At least 36 >>states, including states parties and non-states >>parties to the ICC Statute, have enacted domestic >>legislation criminalizing forced pregnancy as a >>crime against humanity, or a war crime or both.4 >>The ICC Statute’s definition is largely mirrored in >>the ICC Elements of Crimes that were adopted in >>2002 by the Assembly of States Parties to the ICC >>Statute to assist the Court in interpreting and >>applying the crimes in the ICC Statute.5 The first >>element of the crime of forced pregnancy requires >>that: >>The perpetrator confined one or more women forcibly >>made pregnant, with the intent of >>affecting the ethnic composition of any population or >>carrying out other grave violations of >>international law.6 >>Subsequent to the ICC Statute, forced pregnancy has >>been listed in other international instruments, >>including: >> as a crime against humanity in the 2000 Statute of >>the Special Court for Sierra Leone, >>without a definition; 7 >> >> as a crime against humanity and war crime in >>United National Transitional Administration >>in East Timor’s Regulation 2000/15 on the >>establishment of Panels with exclusive >>jurisdiction over serious criminal offences,8 applying >>the ICC Statute’s definition;9 >> as a crime against humanity and war crime in >>international and non-international armed >>conflicts in the African Union’s Protocol on >>Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of >>the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, 10 >>applying the ICC Statute’s definition;11 >> >>4 See for example: Argentina: Ley 26.200 (2007); >>Australia: International Criminal Court Act 2002; >>Azerbaijan: Criminal >>Code (as amended 2001); Belgium: Act of 5 August 2003 >>on serious violations of international humanitarian >>law; Bosnia >>and Herzegovina: Criminal Code 2003; Burkina Faso: Loi >>052/2009 portant détermination des compétences et de >>la >>procédure de mise en œuvre du Statut de Rome relatif >>à la Cour pénale internationale par les juridictions >>burkinabé; Canada: >>Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act 2000; >>Comoros: Loi n°11-022/au du 13 décembre 2011, >>portant de Mise en >>Oeuvre du Statut de Rome; Croatia: Criminal Code 1998 >>(as amended 2004); Czech Republic: Criminal Code >>(08/01/2009); >>Fiji: Crimes Decree 2009 (decree 44 of 2009); Georgia: >>Criminal Code (as amended 1999); Germany: Act to >>introduce the >>Code of Crimes against International Law of 26 June >>2002; Kenya: International Crimes Act 2008; Lesotho: >>Penal Code Act >>2010; Mali: Penal Code 2001; Malta: Criminal Code 1854 >>(as amended 2002); Mauritius, International Criminal >>Court Act >>2011; Netherlands: International Crimes Act 2003; New >>Zealand: International Crimes and International >>Criminal Court Act >>2000; Norway: Penal Code (as amended 2008); >>Philippines: Act on Crimes Against International >>Humanitarian Law, >>Genocide and Other Crimes Against Humanity 2009; >>Republic of Ireland: International Criminal Court Act >>2006; Republic >>of Korea: Act on the Punishment of Crimes within the >>Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court >>(2007); Romania: >>Criminal Code; Rwanda: Law No33 Bis/2003 repressing >>the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity and war >>crimes; >>Samoa: International Criminal Court Act 2007; >>Slovenia: Criminal Code 2008; South Africa: >>Implementation of the Rome >>Statute of the International Criminal Court Act 2002; >>Spain: Criminal Code (as amended 2003); Switzerland: >>Criminal Code >>1937 (as amended 2010); Timor-Leste: Penal Code 2009; >>Trinidad and Tobago: International Criminal Court Act >>2006; >>Turkey: Criminal Code (2004); Uganda: International >>Criminal Court Act 2010; UK: International Criminal >>Court Act 2001; >>UK: International Criminal Court (Scotland) Act 2001; >>Uruguay: Ley 18.026 (2006). >>5 >>ICC Statute, Article 9. >>6 >>ICC Elements of Crime, Article 7(1)(g)-4, para.1; >>Article 8(2)(b)(xxii)-4, para.1; Article >>8(2)(e)(vi)-4, para.1. >>7 Article 2(g). >>8 See Sections 5.1(g); 6.1(b)(xxii) and 6.1(e)(vi) >>9 Section 5.2(e). >>10 Annex, Statute of the African Court of Justice and >>Human and Peoples’ Rights, Article 28C(1)(g); >>28D(b)(xxiii); and >>28D(e)(vi). >>11 Article 28C(2)(f). >> >> - >>http://mikesouth.com/porn-wikileaks/pornwikileaks-foun >d >>er-donny-long-new-human-trafficking-charges-again-7723 >2 >>/ >> >>boggy creek fish camp an rv park near kissimmee >>florida >> >>Now, every state is different, but many states have >>similar laws. So keep in mind that if you have a case, >>your situation and circumstances could be different >>based on the laws in your local jurisdiction. If you >>have any legal questions, you should always contact a >>lawyer in your area. >> >>Accessing someone’s email. >> >>Creating fake social media accounts using their name >>and pretending to be them. If you create a social >>media account meant to intimidate another person, that >>violates statutes in many areas of the US. >> >>If you send a message online intended to harass or >>embarrass another person and initiate any >>communication with them that includes obscene >>comment(s) or if you call someone and cause their >>phone to ring repeatedly, if you make a call and you >>don’t hang up, or and/or if you send repeated >>communications that you are meant to annoy someone, or >>embarrass or offend, you might have violated statues. >> >>On December 14, 2016, 14 Jane Doe’s sued the owners >>of Girls Do Porn in civil court because, at the time, >>the criminal courts wouldn’t get involved. Their >>claim was simple: we were hired by a company >>(GirlsDoPorn.com) to create an adult video, which they >>were told would be distributed overseas, and nobody in >>the US would ever see it. >> >>They would offer a larger than normal amount for these >>films, so the 14 girls at the time all agreed. >>However, many of them, when they arrived, were told >>things like oh, you don’t look like your photos, so >>we can’t pay you the $2,000 or $4,000 (the amount >>varied) that we originally said, best we can do is a >>few hundred bucks. >> >>The videos were all released in the US as they had >>always been intended to do so. Since, however, consent >>is conditional, they sued. Their consent was based on >>the original promises, and since those things >>weren’t true, they didn’t technically consent. >>Consent is key in sexual activity. >> >>Over and over in the initial complaint, you’ll find >>references to the PornWikiLeaks website that was later >>sold by Donny Long to BangBros. >> >>Donald Carlos Seoane has always stated he did not own >>pornwikileaks. As this was a statement he repeated non >>stop every time he was called out. then in 2015 he >>says he sold it to bang bros... not adding up timeline >>wise. venetian productions has always owned the >>website. donny ong has always administered it and was >>logging into it constantly on a daily business. his >>i.p. address will show he was online constantly. pratt >>after 2014 was also logging in from all points where >>ever he was at that time. new zealand, florida... >>peru, thailand... panama. cloudflare and server >>activities there. >> >>“UNLAWFUL CONFINEMENT” >>The act of “unlawful confinement” includes, but is >>broader than, subjecting a person to “unlawful >>imprisonment” – a term notably rejected in >>drafting the definition in the ICC Statute.44 Indeed, >>if >>the essence of the crime “is in unlawfully placing >>the victim in a position in which she cannot >> >>35 Abortion is safe when it is performed by a trained >>provider under sanitary conditions in the case of >>surgical abortion, or >>when a person has access to high quality medication, >>information and support to undergo a medical abortion. >>See: World >>Health Organization, Safe Abortion: Technical and >>Policy Guidance for Health Systems (second edition, >>2012). >>36 Prosecutor v. Ongwen, supra note 14, para. 100. See >>also: Boon, supra note 29, at 660 further argues: >>“The legal harm >>in forced pregnancy is that women are kept pregnant by >>means of confinement, violating their rights to bodily >>integrity and >>privacy.” >>37 Mellet v. Ireland, Human Rights Committee (HRC) >>communication no. 2324/2013, 9 June 2016, para. 7.11; >>Whelan v. >>Ireland, HRC communication no. 2425/2014, 12 June >>2017, para. 7.12. >>38 United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and >>Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment 22 on the >>Right to sexual >>and reproductive health (2016), at para. 5: >> >>The right to sexual and reproductive health entails a >>set of freedoms and entitlements. The freedoms include >>the >>right to make free and responsible decisions and >>choices, free of violence, coercion and >>discrimination, regarding >>matters concerning one’s body and sexual and >>reproductive health. The entitlements include >>unhindered access >>to a whole range of health facilities, goods, services >>and information, which ensure all people full >>enjoyment of >>the right to sexual and reproductive health under >>article 12 of the Covenant. >> >>See also: paras 25 and 56; CESCR, General Comment 14 >>on the right to health under Article 12 of the ICESR >>(2000), para. >>8; Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on the >>right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest >>attainable standard of >>physical and mental health, UN Doc. A/66/254, 3 August >>2011, para. 12: “[t]he use of overt physical >>coercion by the State >>or non-State actors, such as in cases of forced >>sterilization, forced abortion, forced contraception >>and forced pregnancy >>has long been recognized as an unjustifiable form of >>State-sanctioned coercion and a violation of the right >>to health.” >> >>39 CESCR, General Comment No. 22 (The right to sexual >>and reproductive health (Article 12)), UN Doc. >>E/C.12/GC/22, >>(2016), para. 10: “lack of emergency obstetric care >>services or denial of abortion often leads to maternal >>mortality and >>morbidity, which in turn constitutes a violation of >>the right to life or security, and in certain >>circumstances can amount to >>torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment”; >>HRC, General Comment 36 on Article 6 of the ICCPR on >>the Right to >>Life, UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/36, 30 October 2018, para. 8: >>“Although States parties may adopt measures designed >>to regulate >>voluntary terminations of pregnancy, such measures >>must not result in violation of the right to life of a >>pregnant woman or >>girl, or her other rights under the Covenant.” >> >>40 CESCR, General Comment 22, para. 40; UN Committee >>on the Rights of the Child (CRC), General Comment 15 >>(right of >>the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable >>standard of health), UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/15, 2013, para. >>70; Interim >>report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of >>everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable >>standard of physical >>and mental health, supra note 38, paras 21 and 36. >> >>41 Mellet v. Ireland, supra note 37, para. 7.11. >> >>42 See HRC, General Comment 28 (Equality of rights >>between men and Women (Article 3)), UN Doc. >>CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.10, 2000, para. 20; see also, >>Karen Noelia Llantoy Huamán v. Peru, HRC, UN Doc. >>CCPR/C/85/d/1153/2003, 2005, para. 6.4; L.M.R. v. >>Argentina, HRC, UN Doc. CCPR/C/101/D/1608/2007, 2011, >>para. >>9.3. >>43 CESCR, General Comment 22, supra note 39, para. 10; >>Whelan v. Ireland, supra note 37, para. 7.7. >>44 See Boon, supra note 29 at 662, footnote 164.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.