VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:38:09 03/09/03 Sun
Author: Stag 92
Subject: Most of St Peters Wins - Clarke Had 15-16 Shots!!
In reply to: Stag 92 's message, "Final Comment on Clarke" on 07:29:47 03/09/03 Sun

Hey Stag 89 - Go back to St. Peters statistics and look game by game - you will hopefully (if you pull your blinders off) see that the majority of their wins came when he wasn't chucking it. You refer to an average of 20 shots per game, right? Averages mean nothing, which is why I went to games that I saw. Game at St. Peters, which I didn't mention, 9-27 (another spectacular night). Most of St. Peter's wins, and their weren't many, came when he was about 16 shots/night. You also refer to him as a point guard. I can tell you this basketball genius, if my point guard has a 1.05 Assist/TO ratio, he is sitting. Look at Goode and Todd's - more like a point guard. I don't want my point guard throwing up 30 shots on certain nights. Maybe you should refer to him as a shooting guard, because certainly I don't want a point guard doing this. Look into the numbers you throw around, peel back the onion, if you will. You will learn more. But then again, I am biased and have no basketball knowledge or if any, not even close to you. You are clueless.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Boy are you stupid, '92! -- Stag '89, 14:24:15 03/09/03 Sun

You show your ignorance even more. Can't even stay on topic. I could care less if St. Pete's wins or stays in the dumper. I repeat my statement: I would take Clark over any guard we currently have. You, and I repeat, said you would take all our guards over Clark. I think this shows your stupidity which you further magnify by trying to cover your ignorant a$$. All you have done all year is rant and criticize players and people. Funny, when it comes back in your face you can't handle. Most are aware of your ignorance and cowardly retreats.......this only serves to illustate further.

BTW, after a good game, you now turn tail and want to admit that Todd is not a bad guard. What a hypocrite and judge of talent you are.

Go Stags!!!!!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: 89, boy are you a homo -- Stag 92, 15:57:54 03/09/03 Sun

Trying to understand your comment about Todd, never said Todd was a bad guard, and wanted him starting from Day 1. Are you talking about Goode you illiterate F. You talked about St. Peter's challenging Loyola for the basement w/out Clark?!? Now you talk about not caring about St. Peter's? You are the stupid one. You take Clark and go chear for the Cocks (you fit in well as a cock). You now want to start in on me about criticizing, etc. Do you attend any games? Do me a favor, spend your time in Jersey watching Clark - you have nothing to say about the game last night or predictions - rather, decide to pipe up when this topic comes up and further, to initiate attacks. Your a moron and probably one of those kids who got beat up too much. Keep posting, and I will keep responding homo.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> You show your real colors, '92 -- Stag '89, 19:01:04 03/09/03 Sun

Not only are you ignorant, but your frustration and inability to respond intelligently forces you into name calling expletives. Typical of someone void of intellect.
Your orginal, ludicrous statement now has brought the wrath of the 'cock followers who, I must admit, make far more sense than you. Don't let the facts get in the way of your thinking. Hard to believe you ever made it to graduation. People like you make my diploma feel less far less valuable.

Must have been hard being the kid always picked last.

Go Stags!!!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: 89, boy are you a homo -- A realist!, 16:35:46 03/12/03 Wed

Boy, you are an ignorant cuss, aren't you!!


[ Edit | View ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.