VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:09:15 02/05/03 Wed
Author: Rave
Subject: Re: Thanks for a reasoned response rather than a flame
In reply to: Menzies 's message, "Thanks for a reasoned response rather than a flame" on 16:48:19 02/03/03 Mon

I know where you're comming from, but there must be a better way to do things which are not so cost prohibitive to colleges and not so blatant in reverse discrimination. One thing that might help is cutting women's hoop scholarships from 15 to 13, like the men. There are not enough decent women high school players to stock 10 college teams. That is why there is no parity in the sport. Team's like UConn and Tennesse are actually hurting the sport. Yet the scholarship level stays at 15. Absolutely Ludicrous....

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.