Can you be both pink and red? -- The Blue Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:19:57 03/12/01 Mon
Author: Katey
Subject: Can you be both pink and red?
In reply to: jd 's message, "Re: Ooooh, a pinko, eh? ;-)" on 15:29:18 03/09/01 Fri

>So, are you saying you're representative of the norm?
*ahem* are you saying I'm not "normal"?
>LOL! I'd point out that the so-called "lower orders"
>tend more toward communistic communities than do the
>more intelligent species. ;-) Not to say intelligence
>= antisocial behaviour, just that independence
>generally increases w/ intelligence.

Actually, this is normal human grouping behavior (that's *grouping* not *groping*). People tend to hang out with those on their own IQ level..give or take 5 points. The smarter you are, the less likely you will have a crowd around you.

So, where's that
>leave you??? ;-) Marx is dead, ya kno? LOL!
>
>Personally, I differentiate between being "social" and
>being "socialist." ;-) I consider myself very much the
>former, but not too inclined toward the latter. ;-)
>
>BTW, you familiar w/ syndicalism and situationists?
>In particular a hybrid tract entitled, The
>Revolutionary Pleasure of Thinking for Yourself? It's
>on the 'net if you're not, and interested. :-)
>
I'll check it out. ;)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Oh yeah! -- jd, 08:14:01 03/13/01 Tue