Re: RE: training grounds - for all concerned -- The Blue Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:03:36 04/30/01 Mon
Author: Anonyscar
Subject: Re: RE: training grounds - for all concerned
In reply to: smokelike-a-fiend 's message, "RE: training grounds - for all concerned" on 07:22:10 04/29/01 Sun

>I'm thinking that this little project is, or has grown
>within my mind to be, bigger and more complex than I
>originally anticipated.

Ya think?

>I also believe that this forum
>is woefully inadequate to our needs.

Ya think?

> The structure I'm referring to is that of,
>for lack of a better term, individual rights leads
>directly to anarchism.

That's how I got there. If you're going to justify one, you can't be consistent without justifying them *all*.

>LIke the little proposition
>that our admin. geek recently put in the quotation
>rotation at the LG. This is what the structure I'm
>referring to would logically and coherently
>demonstrate. Once we devise this basic structure, it
>can be applied to any and all w/ only minor
>modification or customization.

Yup. BTW, I really don't want anyone to bash my brains out just because I won't fill out a goddamn Census form.

>
>So, what I'm trying to say is that I think we will be
>needing a custom forum more along the lines of the LG.

At one point I said "say the word", is that the word? Here's a better idea, I think. If you go to the RelRef forum, you'll see a link to my "alternate" forum for them. It's got nice organizational funcationality, ain't to hard to set up bare-bones. If you need a link, ask me proper through email or the LG.

>The software behind this one is just not on a par w/
>that, and it presents an unnecessary inconvenience.
>

Agreed, plus we're spamming somebody else's board. ;-)

>But, again, please bear w/ me as I try to further
>clarify my ideas on this point as well. I'll try and
>get something outlined in the next day or two for your
>consideration.

Okay.
>
>123

456

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

eway avn'thay iedtray igpay atinlay etyay! -- umponalogbay, 10:20:36 04/30/01 Mon
- Re: eway avn'thay iedtray igpay atinlay etyay! -- rapkay, 11:14:47 04/30/01 Mon