Re: response to Homo's in Hell -- BLessed be Sister Rosie's followers...

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:05:04 04/29/01 Sun
Author: blonde77
Subject: Re: response to Homo's in Hell
In reply to: katherine 's message, "Re: response to Homo's in Hell" on 13:14:40 04/28/01 Sat

so why don't over half of the wiccans know what the jewelry they are wearing means? i think ppl who believe that wicca gives them all these so-called magic powers are really weak ppl trying to make up for the fact that they can't deal with real life. a strong person doesn't need spells to make it, besides most of them just think they have powers when all they do is talk like they do. wicca is bullshit.
>
Wicca is a branch of paganism, just like all catholics
>are cristians but not all cristians are catholic, all
>wiccans are pagans but not all pagans are wiccan. and
>all the things they wear do have meanings.
> -katherine
>
>>maybe paganism might have been around a long time, but
>>how do you explain wiccan... which has only been
>>around since the 1960's or 1970's? i think wiccan is
>>just trendy... "let's wear the cool jewelry that mean
>>nothing to us cuz we never found out the meaning."
>>"oh, oh, i want to have magical powers and roam the
>>earth in search for... uh, uh.. i don't know." wiccan
>>is bullshit. actually i don't agree with anything
>>that's not christianity, but that's besides the point.
>>
>>
>>Response to Homo's in Hell.
>>>
>>>First and foremost Sister Rosie, I have been around
>>>nuns and sisters my entire life and not once has any
>>>of them written or said anything as hate full as what
>>>you wrote , I find it disgraceful to all sisters.
>>>Although I do not follow Christian teachings I was
>>>brought up in the Roman Catholic community and I have
>>>a great admiration for women who have dedicated their
>>>lives to the service of God. A woman of your age
>>>should have more respect for them.
>>>
>>>Second of all you fall under a group of people
>>>referred to as "Jesus freaks" this group of people is
>>>commonly known for overstepping the boundaries of
>>>common decency and utterly destroying the reputation
>>>of the Christian faith. After having read your letter
>>>over more than once I have determined that you are
>one
>>>sick person, not to mention that your letter has
>>>probably done more to harm than to help. The
>stupidity
>>>of many of the things you have written amazes me.
>>>Where is it written that the Internet and more
>>>specifically open diary should be reserved for god?
>>>There you are completely mistaken. If you wish to
>fine
>>>Christian friendly sites I'm sure you can find one,
>>>opendiary is not it. The fact that you think that
>all
>>>non conservative republican Christians are sinners
>>>makes you a racist, racism is a form of hate, and
>>>correct me if I'm wrong but aren't sister's supposed
>>>to spread love and not hate.
>>>
>>>I would like to touch on the matter of homosexuality.
>>>Although I am straight (and a republican I might add)
>>>I have many homosexual and bisexual friends and none
>>>of them deserve your hateful words. In your letter
>you
>>>combine Satan with Homosexuality and I assure you
>they
>>>have no connection. How these people choose to behave
>>>with other of the same sex is their business alone
>and
>>>has nothing to do with you in the least bit. In your
>>>letter you referred to the "dark harlots" as "pagan
>>>sinners form Africa" I will not explain to you why
>>>it's impossible to call a homosexual a "pagan sinner
>>>from Africa"
>>>
>>>1. Many people use the word "pagan" everyday; few use
>>>it in the correct way. Many would tell you including
>>>the dictionary that "pagan" is a word for heathen.
>>>They are mistaken. "Pagan" comes from the Latin word
>>>"paganus" which means farm dweller. Paganism is an
>>>earth-based religion, which is older, that
>>>Christianity itself. So in order for your remark to
>>>work they would have to be of the pagan religion. But
>>>it is still not correct. WHY?
>>>
>>>2. Because in the pagan religion sex of this kind is
>>>allowed, and any sex act outside of marriage is not
>>>seen as sinning. So far I have established that there
>>>can be no such thing as a "pagan sinner" when it
>comes
>>>to homosexuality.
>>>
>>>3. And if there can be no such thing as a "pagan
>>>sinner" they can't be from Africa. Just incase you
>>>felt like talking trash about Africa some more I
>would
>>>first like to tell you that scientists have
>discovered
>>>that that's where humans originated from. Just though
>>>I would let you know before you made yourself look
>>>even more stupid. Oh and before you start ranting
>>>about the creation story and Adam and eve. I have
>>>spoken on this topic with more than one priest and
>>>they do believe in evolution except it's explained in
>>>a better way. Next time you take the bible seriously
>>>and not as a metaphor as intended, you might want to
>>>stop and think.
>>>
>>>4. One more thing before I get back on track you
>>>mentioned the "harlots" as you call them dancing
>>>around naked for Satan, this is not true either. But
>>>it goes back to the whole pagan thing. Some Pagans,
>>>not all, prefer to worship in the nude or "scyclad"
>as
>>>they call it. It's a symbol of the purity of their
>>>intent. And I'm sure someone with a pure intent would
>>>have nothing to do with Satan, right? That's right,
>>>pagans have no once source of evil, meaning they do
>>>not believe in an entity such as Satan. Please get
>>>your facts straight.
>>>
>>>
>>>Back to the letter, your hatred for masturbation
>leads
>>>me to have to conclude one of 2 things. Either you do
>>>masturbate and are ashamed of it. Or you are in
>>>desperate need of an orgasm, which in this case is
>>>easy to fix with masturbation. Masturbation has many
>>>good qualities, which can be quoted by doctors and
>>>scientist alike. I will not list them here for sake
>of
>>>time. One quality which it does have is it's
>>>reputation for being "the safest sex" if people can
>>>please themselves then they will be less likely to
>>>look for it else where.
>>>
>>>If you think that your god is evil enough to
>"punishes
>>>sinners babies with physical deformities!" than damn
>>>you and your god. If I did believe in Satan, which I
>>>don't, I would tell you that deforming babies because
>>>of the sins of their parents is the most Satanic
>thing
>>>I have ever heard. And if you think trying to "fry
>the
>>>demons right out of their loins!" though
>>>electric-shock therapy is a good thing then you
>should
>>>rot in that place you call hell for all eternity.
>>>
>>>In the future please know your facts before saying
>>>something so completely ridiculous that you sound
>like
>>>a 12-year-old.
>>>
>>>
>>>-Katherine

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: response to Homo's in Hell -- William, 10:05:14 04/29/01 Sun