Author:
Dave/Ken/Jack/1st Amendment/ etc, etc,...lol. Dumbass libs
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 13:02:26 06/30/02 Sun
Author Host/IP: 216.40.249.60
In reply to:
cost her millions. The Veeckster
's message, "Well yeah she didn't realize it would become public and so of course did not realize bad press would" on 09:48:52 06/30/02 Sun
Was this the same NEWSWEEK that said the the Democrats were rigging the counts in Broward County, FL?
Just wondering. Bet you didn't know about that.
That was...UH.. NEWSWEEK!
>And my source was, uh, NEWSWEEK Ken.
>
>Check out the circumstantial evidence. It warrants an
>investigation, which is exactly what's happening.
>Shewas very close with both the broker and the CEO.
>There's also a trail of phone calls logged and plus
>the broker's assistant now says there was no agreement
>with Martha to sell if the stock dropped below $60 a
>share and that he was pressured by the broker to say
>that there was. Hence the broker's suspension from
>Merrill Lynch. You don't find that warrants an
>investigation?
>
>Also, your argument is that she wouldn't have done it
>because she would have known in advance it would come
>out? I doubt it. It is possible she didn't consciously
>think it through or realize it was privileged inf she
>got. If so, she should say so and come clean not deny.
>
>As for your point that it was inconsequential sum,
>Anyone that rich manages every cent of her money.
>
>I have always LIKED Martha. I admire her business
>savvy and hard work and spunk. So I'm sorry to see
>this but the fact is it smells fishy.
>
>
>
>>It was 20K difference between when she sold it, and
>>when everyone else found out about the FDA flunking
>>them out.
>>
>>In other words, if she had waited until the general
>>announcement was made, she would've gotten 20K less
>>for her stock. Big deal.
>>
>>She's lost MILLIONS on HER stock as a result of the
>>bad press. But that ain't enough. The politicians
>>wanna grandstand.
>>
>>No, insider trading isn't good. However, if she
>>wanted to really do some insider tradiing, she sure as
>>hell could've made more than 20K.
>>
>>I mean, the damn woman's a millionaire a hundred times
>>over. Do you really think she'd risk losing MILLIONS,
>>which is what happened to her own stock, over a 20K
>>savings?????????
>>
>>Grandstanding in front of a scapegoat. That's what
>>it's all about.
>>
>>"Insider trading" didn't seem to be a problem when
>>Hillary made 50K off of a single investment, and never
>>invested again. Sheer luck?
>>
>>Senate libs need to worry more about getting their
>>jobs done, than Martha's 20K.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>So, just to make sure I understand your position--
>you
>>>think insider trading is ok?
>>>
>>>yes or no?
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
|
Feedback: 