Date Posted:10:09 Author: Dwayanu-15Apr02 Subject: Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch In reply to:
Hendrik - 14 April 2002
's message, "Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch" on 10:08
I do not believe that I said anything about a difference in that particular text. There was no reason for him to change it. What I said was that the introduction to the book and the part on the Baptism of Fire more fully explained what the Christ Child was.
But that has nothing to do with the particular post that you responded to. My statement only addressed why I felt that Ketch wanted to limit the discussion to just that one version.