Date Posted:10:59 Author: Eponymous - 1 Dec 2001 Subject: Re: More SRF Controversy In reply to:
Bill - 30Nov01
's message, "Re: More SRF Controversy" on 10:58
I've given several arguments about why I believe PY's teachings are in the main seriously flawed; so the adherent's stock response - "read the master's teachings and then you'll understand" - is flabbergasting to me.
And it is arguments, not opinions, that interest me. My posts are intended for those who share that interest. Since I do not detect any arguments in your post, I presume that your interest lies elsewhere.