VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:24:28 10/14/09 Wed
Author: o allen (good versus and good teachings, thankyou)
Subject: Re: DEATH PENALTY FOR HOMOSEXUALS is Prescribed in the Bible (Part 1) by Peter J Peters
In reply to: David R.W. Wadsworth 's message, "DEATH PENALTY FOR HOMOSEXUALS is Prescribed in the Bible (Part 1) by Peter J Peters" on 09:29:48 05/07/01 Mon

>
good teachings on this website.
>
>The truth is, the Bible advocates discrimination
>against, intolerance of and the death penalty
>for homosexuals. Read the following Bible Scriptures
>and then go to your own Bible and look up the passages
>for yourself.
>
>"If a man; also lie will mankind, as he lieth with
>a woman, both of them have committed an abomination:
>they shall surely be put to death; their blood
>shall be upon them."
>Leviticus 20:13 KJV
>
>"Thou shall not lie with mankind, as with
>womankind.: it is an abomination." Leviticus 18:22
>KJV
>
>"Or do you not know that the unrighteous shaft not
>Inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived;
>neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterer, nor
>effeminate, nor HOMOSEXUALS, nor thieves, nor
>the covetous, nor drunkards. nor revilers, nor
>swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God.”
>Corinthians 6:9,10 NASV (Emphasis added)
>
>{Proof that Mr. Peters' is an antichrist. He quotes
>the writtings of the man Jesus Christ said was a liar
>of Satan and the antichrist proving as Jesus Christ
>said, "You, (Professional Faith Merchants) draw near
>me with your lips but your heart follows Satan!" Mr.
>Peters' Bible was mistranslated and he is preaching
>false doctrine of Satan! The word "homosexual" didn't
>exist until coined by the U.S. Government in 1892!}
>
>"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven
>against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men,
>who hold the truth in unrighteousness; because that
>which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God
>halt showed it unto them. For the invisible things of
>him from the creation of the world are clearly seen,
>being understood by the things that are made. even his
>power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
>because that when they knew God, they glorified him
>nor as God. neither were thankful; but became vain in
>their imaginations, and their foolish heart was
>darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they
>became fools changed the glory of the incorruptible
>God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to
>birds, and fourfooted (sic) beasts, and creeping
>things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness
>through the lust of their own hearts, to dishonour
>(sic) their own bodies between themselves: who changed
>the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served
>creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for
>ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile
>affections; for even their women did change the
>natural use into that which is against nature: and
>likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the
>woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men
>with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving
>in themselves that recompence of their error which was
>meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in
>their knowledge, God gave them over to reprobate mind,
>to do those things which are not convenient; being
>filled with all unrighteousness, fornication,
>wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy,
>murder, debate, deceit, whisperers, backbiters, haters
>of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil
>things, disobedient to parents without understanding,
>covenantbreakers (sic), without natural affection,
>implacable, unmerciful; who knowing the judgment of
>God, that they which commit such things are WORTHY
>OF DEATH, not only do the same, but have pleasure
>in them that do them." Romans 1:18-32 (KJV
>Emphasis added)
>
>Is it not apparent that the Bible Scriptures advocate
>discrimination, intolerance and the DEATH
>PENALTY concerning homosexuality? Then is not the
>Title of this writing true? Is the very title made you
>angry, then this author must ask you the same question
>the Apostle Paul once asked: “Am I therefore become
>your enemy, because I tell you the truth?”
>Galatians 4:16 KJV) For those who hate tile truth,
>anyone who proclaims it they will also hale and will
>consider such a one an enemy. They will accuse their
>enemy of HATE and INTOLERANCE when in fact. it is they
>who hat and cannot tolerate the truth. For such people
>no amount of reason. patience or love will make the
>truth palatable to them unless they first repent.
>
>There are others who may not hate truth but are so far
>removed or confused concerning it, that when it's
>heard, it sounds RADICAL and EXTREME. Mary in
>America's Judeo-Christian church world fall in this
>category. Because such people have been taught that
>being a radical or extremist is evil, they tend to
>reject any truth that, to them and their surroundings,
>seems radical or extreme. Once this author spoke to a
>political science class al a University and was billed
>as a right wing extremist. So the question was asked
>of the students. "How many Christians are there in
>the audience?" About half the hands went up. Next
>it was asked, "How many radicals, extremists or
>intolerant people are in the audience?” and not
>one hand was raised. What a contradiction. All the
>people who claimed to be followers of Jesus Christ
>also claimed not to be what He was. Frankly, He was
>willing to withstand public scorn and ridicule for
>truth (Matthew 27:40,41 ), offend people if necessary
>(Matthew 15:12) and even die for what He believed in.
>As for tolerance, he would not tolerable such people
>as the money changes and actually confronted them
>physically (John 2:14,15). Obviously, He was a radical
>and an extremist and to the virtuous, so-called
>Christian in the Judeo-Christian churches, it all
>seems too unchristian.
>
>The truth of the matter is, in one respect,
>homosexuals are far more virtuous than are the
>lukewarm, cowardly, goody goody, praise the Lord,
>Judeo-Christians. Homosexuals are willing to: promote
>their life style, endure public scorn and rejection if
>necessary, rally to the aid of another homosexual,
>fight any who oppose their life style and, as we shall
>see this writing, are willing to prescribe the
>death penalty to those who oppose them. Unlike
>the modern day; lukewarm Judeo-Christian, they are
>radicals are extremists. To Jesus, they are far more
>acceptable than the lukewarm Judeo-Christian. “I
>know your deeds. that you are neither cold nor hot; l
>would that you were cold or hot. So because you are
>lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold. I will spit you
>out of My mouth." Revelation 3:15.16 (NASV)
>
>This writing will be opposed as much by those who call
>themselves Christians as by homosexuals. They will try
>to reason or explain away these Bible verses that
>discriminate against and prescribe the death
>penalty for homosexuals. So in this writing, their
>futile objections and explanations will be answered.
>
>The enclosed news article (see page iv) is a good case
>in point of the lukewarm and un-Biblical (sic) manner
>in which the Judeo-Christian world is coping with
>homosexuality. They sign petitions and become part of
>the effort of Colorado For Family Values but notice
>what their values are {see article page iv): "These
>documents mean that homosexuals will continue to enjoy
>the same basic constitutional rights and protections
>as any American citizens," he said, reading from
>prepared statement.
>
>"They’ll have the right to free speech and free
>assembly. They'll have the right to do business and
>act politically. they’ll have the right to five with
>whomever they wish. They’ll have the right to safety
>in their property and persons. And they'll have every
>legal redress for violence against either themselves
>or their property," he said."
>
>Now the historical record shows, forty years ago. The
>family values in America would never allow homosexuals
>to have free speech. free assembly, safety, etc., and
>thus, the homosexual was afraid to come out of the
>closet. Now lukewarm Judeo-Christians consider it
>family values to allow them to do so. Such values are
>not Bible values, for the Bible allows those who
>continue in the sin of homosexuality, no such rights.
>{Please understand that it is not wrong for Christians
>to sign petitions to stop the advancement of
>homosexuals but to stop at that point and thus fail to
>pursue the true Bible values and to condemn those that
>do, is to be lukewarm.)
>
>
NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
>
>Petitions blocking
>gay rights turned in
>
>By CARL HILLIARD
>The Associated Press

>
>[DENVER -- More than 85,000 signatures were submitted
>to the Colorado Secretary of State's office Friday by
>a group that wants the state's constitution to provide
>no special protection for gays or lesbians.
>
>"We consider these documents to be among the most
>Important signed pieces of paper in the entire United
>States," said Will Perkins, executive board chairman
>of Colorado for Family Values, a Colorado Springs
>group.
>
>The group has been circulating petitions for months in
>an effort to get 49,279 valid signatures that will put
>the issue before voters on the November general
>election ballot. Organized gay groups argued that the
>proposal, if approved by the voters would overturn
>existing ordinances Approved in Denver. Boulder and
>Aspen that bars discrimination against gays. Perkins
>denied that is the intent of the proposal.
>
>"These documents mean that homosexuals will continue
>to enjoy the same basic constitutional rights and
>protections as any American citizen." he said. reading
>from a prepared statement. “They’ll have the right to
>free speech and free assembly. They’ll have the right
>to do business and act politically. They’ll have the
>right to live with whomever they wish. They'll have
>the right to safety in their property and persons. And
>they'll have every legal redress for violence against
>either themselves or their property,” he said.]
>
>To the homosexual, it should be said that you've made
>great gains In promoting your lifestyle. You have and
>continue to fight courageously. You want to eliminate
>discrimination and intolerance against homosexuals and
>have fought hard to eliminate any laws that would
>discriminate against you. DON'T YOU BECOME LUKEWARM
>HYPOCRITES LIKE THOSE SO-CALLED CHRISTIANS IN THE
>CHURCHES. Go after Bible Law, also. Demand that the
>Bible be outlawed as hale literature or some such
>thing. At the very least, demand that these Bible
>Scriptures that discriminate against you be removed.
>It shouldn’t be that hard. The so-called Christians
>didn't put up much 0f a fight when a few black robed
>individuals demanded like Bible be removed from their
>schools, so it shouldn’t be that hard to remove it
>entirely or at least those Bible Scriptures that
>oppose you. Perhaps you could start off by promoting a
>law of man that demands all Bible translations be
>revised to eliminate discrimination, intolerance and
>advocation of the death penalty concerning
>homosexuals. (I’d suggest you start this way and wait
>to eliminate the entire Bible later.) Do it in the
>name of love, peace and harmony. In fact, you could
>even do it in the name of Christianity using the cross
>as a passivist, effeminate-looking Jesus on a banner
>for such a crusade. Maybe you could use a slogan such
>as, “Jesus loves homosexuals, why don’t you?” on the
>banner and those who oppose you, you can label as
>haters, radicals, extremists, bigots, etc. It
>shouldn’t be that hard to do. Let’s face it. You’ll
>have plenty of help from the liberal media and there
>are plenty of whoring-type politicians that will fall
>all over themselves to help you as long as you’ll vote
>for them. At first, you could do this on a state by
>state by state basis. The law could be written in many
>different ways. Perhaps you could make it so that all
>Christians or churches have to certify they will use
>only the revised, non-discriminatory Bibles. Most
>churches are stale incorporated and thus will do what
>their masters, such as the Secretary of State, tells
>them. Maybe all churches should register with the
>Secretary of State certifying all members have the
>sanitized Bible version. Any church that refuses can
>then be hauled into court by the state attorney
>general's office. The judges (who may fear the
>homosexual crowd more than God or who may be one
>themselves) will then uphold state Imposed fines
>against that church and the pastor of that church.
>Don't worry about the other churches rallying to the
>cause, because they don't want to offend anyone and
>risk a drop in attendance (bad business you know).
>Besides, tell them that Romans Chapter 13, says they
>have to obey the authorities. Later, the law could be
>expanded to require all Christians to register their
>Bibles, and all unsanitized (sic) Bibles be
>confiscated lest one falls into the hands of an
>extremist, and he begins to believe and someone gets
>hurt.
>
>You, homosexuals, should think about this project very
>seriously. You can do it. You've shown more courage
>and fight than those so-called Christian soldiers who
>oppose you by trying to strike down pro-homosexual
>city ordinances that you've worked so hard to get. You
>really believe in your life style. They don't even
>believe or promote all the Bible Scriptures concerning
>homosexuality. You don't see them advocating the
>death penalty for homosexuality, do you? Then,
>obviously, they don't fully believe their Bibles so
>they won't fight that hard when you demand the
>revision of their Bibles. Think about it. For the
>truth is, unless you take action along these lines,
>you stand in danger. For someone’s liable to start
>reading and believing the Bible as it now stands. If
>that happens, then it's all over for you.


>


>

INTOLERANCE OF, DISCRIMINATION
>AGAINST AND THE DEATH PENALTY
>FOR HOMOSEXUALS


>is prescribed in the Bible

>
>INTOLERANCE, DISCRIMINATION and LAW are three
>words that go together. In the spring of 1991, l was a
>guest speaker for a psychology class at Colorado State
>University during what has been called their "Gay
>Awareness Week". During such a week, there is a lot of
>rhetoric concerning intolerance of and discrimination
>against homosexuals. I polled the class to see who was
>in favor of the concept of discrimination and
>intolerance. No one was in favor of such things. Next,
>I asked the class how many were In favor of LAW and
>ORDER and many were. But just as it's Impossible for
>order to exist without law, so is it impossible to
>have a law without intolerance and discrimination.
>
>LAW BY ITS VERY NATURE IS INTOLERANT AND
>DISCRIMINATORY. For example, suppose one was
>driving down a city street and entered a school zone
>area with a flashing light and a sign that said,
>"Speed Limit-20 MPH" and parked near the curb is a
>police car and its driver is using a radar gun. There
>are two things that are certain. The 20MPH law is
>intolerant and discriminatory. The patrolman WILL NOT
>TOLERATE you going 30 mph and WILL DISCRIMINATE
>AGAINST YOU if you go 30 MPH, i.e., he will pick you
>out of all the drivers, pull you over and punish you
>for violating that law. Thus, with simple reason, it
>is easily understood that law, by its very nature, is
>discriminatory. For most, its simply ignorance to
>claim to be for law and against intolerance and
>discrimination.
>
>FOR HOMOSEXUALS IT'S HYPOCRISY for them to say
>they are against discrimination and intolerance
>because they actively work to promote laws such as
>city ordinances that are designed to protect them
>against discrimination and intolerance. Yet, when one
>realizes that law, by its very nature, is
>discriminatory and intolerant, one realizes they are
>in reality promoting discrimination and intolerance
>all under their hypocritical guise o1 being against
>such.
>
>How tolerant are they of organizations such as the Boy
>Scouts, who oppose the life style known as
>homosexuality? Suppose a man or woman's Christian
>religious convictions forbid them from hiring a
>homosexual to work for them. With so-called,
>anti-discrimination, gay rights ordinances, such
>religiously based actions would not be tolerated and
>such a person would be (or discriminated against) by
>the very law homosexuals promote in he name of
>tolerance.
>
>One church in Boulder, Colorado, dismissed a choir
>leader because site was a homosexual. As a result, the
>homosexuals in the area protested mightily. Now, there
>are homosexual churches In the land that hire
>preachers to teach from their pulpits. Suppose a
>minister who openly preached the Bible Scriptures that
>proclaim the death penalty for homosexuality
>applied for a preaching lob, or choir director's job,
>at one of these churches. Do you honestly think they
>would not be discriminated against? Yes, he would be
>discriminated against by a crowd who would not
>tolerate his preaching. a crowd who proclaims to the
>world they are against discrimination and intolerance.
>The truth is, discrimination and intolerance is a way
>of life. It's just a matter of what we are going to be
>intolerant of and who we are going to discriminate
>against.
>
>For example, in 1988 a city ordinance was proposed by
>the Fort Collins City Council that would have
>forbidden discrimination against homosexuals in the
>area of housing and employment. This author and the
>church he pastors actively opposed the ordinance and
>helped, in part, in defeating it. Later in year, a
>laundry operator refused to take some dirty clothes of
>mine that were left at the laundry business to be
>cleaned. He explained that he did so because I opposed
>the above mentioned city ordinance and that he was
>against intolerance and discrimination. He was
>surprised to find that I did not take offense at such
>an action. How could I for I had fought for his right
>to discriminate. When it was explained to him if I had
>been a homosexual and the city ordinance had passed,
>he wouldn’t have had the right to discriminate against
>me, it caused him to think. Until that point, it had
>never occurred to him that his actions were themselves
>discriminatory and intolerant.
>
>Again, the truth of the matter is, it’s just a matter
>of what we are going to be tolerant of and who we are
>going to discriminate against. For to have order,
>there must be law and with law comes discrimination
>and intolerance. We must then determine what is proper
>discrimination and intolerance.
>
>
DETERMINING PROPER DISCRIMINATION AND
>INTOLERANCE

>
>Obviously, if discrimination and intolerance is
>inherent in law itself, then to have proper
>discrimination and intolerance, we must have proper
>law.
>
>Discrimination and intolerance is prevalent everywhere
>and in everything about us. Take, for example, the
>field of physics. As a physicist studies creation in a
>physics laboratory, hr observes how, for instance, a
>magnet functions. He observes how a magnet
>discriminates concerning what it will pick up. There
>are some items it attracts and some it will not and
>even some it repels such as a similar pole of another
>magnet. The physicist records the discrimination and
>intolerance of a magnet and calls it the law of
>physics.
>
>The chemist in the chemistry lab does likewise. There,
>he observes discrimination and intolerance. He sees
>cations will bond with anions but not with other
>cations. He observes how water and oil will not mix
>and he records all this under the laws of chemistry.
>
>The zoologist also observes discrimination and records
>the biological law of kind after kind. Sparrows don't
>mate with robins, one species will not tolerate
>another in its living domain, etc.
>
>No one calls such discrimination and intolerance in
>the physics or chemistry lab or the zoology field as
>improper because it is all just part of existing law
>known as the law of physics, laws of chemistry and so
>forth.
>
>But where did this existing law come from? Obviously,
>from the One who created physics, chemistry, zoology
>and etc. Regardless of how some may believe the
>creation occurred (evolution the big bang theory or
>Bible Creation). few will deny that the present
>existing laws come from the creator, or God. "For
>the invisible things of him from the creation of the
>world are clearly seen, being understood by the things
>that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so
>that they are without excuse:" Romans l :20 KJV
>
>How, no physics instructor would tell his or her
>students to go do a lab experiment with magnets only
>this time ignore the laws of physics or reverse them.
>No chemistry instructor would do so either lest there
>be the danger of great harm coming to the student in
>the way of an explosion or deadly fumes, etc. Yet, the
>universities of our land are full of psychology and
>sociology instructors who would have their students
>believe they can ignore the Creators Laws on sexual
>morally or reverse those laws or make up their own
>laws and not suffer harm. This is particularly true
>concerning the subject of homosexuality where young
>people are lead to believe they can make up their own
>law, that is choose their own sexual preference. They
>are not being told there is the existing Law of their
>Creator, God, that is not to be disobeyed without
>grave consequences. So, where do we find that law? In
>the Bible Thus, with it comes proper discrimination
>and intolerance.
>
>THE BIBLE MUST BE APPLIED AND OBEYED IN AMERICA
>ACCORDING TO PUBLIC LAW 97-280.
>
>By a joint resolution of both houses of the United
>States Congress, it has been declared that the Bible
>is THE WORD OF GOD and that we need to apply its
>teaching. This is in the Congressional record known as
>public law 97-280 approved October 4, 1982. Following
>is a reprint of it (emphasis author's).
>
>
PUBLIC LAW 97-280 OCTOBER 4, 1982
>
>Joint Resolution
>
>Authoring and requesting the President to proclaim
>1983 as the
>“Year of the Bible”

>
>Whereas the Bible, the Word of God, has made a unique
>contribution in shaping the United States as a
>distinctive and blessed nation and people.
>
>Whereas deeply held religious convictions springing
>from the Holy Scriptures led to the early settlement
>of our Nation,
>
>Whereas the Bible teachings inspired concepts of civil
>government that are contained in our Declaration of
>Independence and Constitution of the United States;
>
>Whereas many of our great national leaders-among them
>Presidents Washington, Jackson, Lincoln, and
>Wilson-paid tribute to the surpassing influence of the
>Bible in our country’s development, as in the words of
>President Jackson that the Bible is “the rock on which
>our Republic rests;”
>
>Whereas the history of our Nation clearly illustrates
>the value of voluntarily applying the teachings of the
>Scriptures in the lives of individuals, families,  and
>societies;
>
>Whereas this nation now faces great challenges that
>will test this Nation as it has been tested before; and
>
>Whereas, that renewing our knowledge of and faith in
>God through Holy Scripture can strengthen us as a
>nation and a people: Now, therefore, be it
>
>Resolved by the Senate and the House of
>Representatives of the United States of America
>Congress assembled, That the President is authorized
>and requested to designate 1983 as national “Year of
>the Bible.” In recognition of both the formative
>influence the Bible has been for our Nation, and our
>national need to study and apply the teachings of the
>Holy Scriptures.”
>
>Approved October 4, 1982
>
>{"PUBLIC LAW 97-280 OCTOBER 4, 1982." Proof that
>Ronald (6) Wilson (6) Reagan (6) is the antichrtist!
>If Mr. Peters didn't tamper with it but quoted it
>correctly, it is unconstitional violating Amendment 1
>of the constitution "Congress shall make no law
>respecting an establishment of religion,...!}
>Sorry Mr. Peters but you can never trust Satan! He'll
>lead you down the path ladden with bull shit every
>time!
>
>Note that it is already law that the Bible is declared
>to be the Word of God and is to be
>applied{Uncontitutional, see above}. Now, if
>the Bible is the Word of God, then the Laws it
>contains are the Laws of God or are the existing Laws
>of the Creator. We have already noted how existing
>Laws of the Creator in other area bring about proper
>discrimination and intolerance which no one with
>wisdom would dare refuse. Then, so it is with the Laws
>in the Bible on homosexuality.
>
>However, those Laws the homosexuals and their foolish
>allies will not tolerate and, in rebellion to the Law,
>they do as the Bible says:
>
>"Because that, when they knew God, they glorified
>him not as God. neither were thankful; but became vain
>in their imaginations. and their foolish heart was
>darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they
>became fools, and changed the glory of the
>incorruptible God into an image made like to
>corruptible and, and to birds, and fourfooted (sic)
>beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave
>them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own
>hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between
>themselves: who changed the truth of God into a lie,
>and worshipped and sewed the creature more than the
>Creator who is blessed lot ever. Amen. For this cause
>God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their
>women did change the natural use into that which is
>against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the
>natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one
>toward another; men with men working that which is
>unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence
>of their error which was meet. And even as they did
>not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave
>them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things
>which are not convenient; being filled with all
>unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness,
>covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder,
>debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters,
>haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors
>of evil things, disobedient to parents, without
>understanding. covenantbreakers (sic),without natural
>affection, implacable. unmerciful: who knowing the
>judgment of God, that they which commit such things
>are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have
>pleasure in them that do." Romans 1:21-32 KJV
>
>{Proof that Mr. Peters' is an antichrist. He quotes
>the writtings of the man Jesus Christ said was a liar
>of Satan and the antichrist proving as Jesus Christ
>said, "You, (Professional Faith Merchants) draw near
>me with your lips but your heart follows Satan!" Mr.
>Peters' Bible was mistranslated and he is preaching
>false doctrine of Satan! The word "homosexual" didn't
>exist until coined by the U.S. Government in 1892!}
>
>Notice in verse 32 of Romans chapter one 1I says. "Who
>knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit
>such things ARE WORTHY OF DEATH..." (Emphasis
>added)
>
>{More proof Saul of Tarsus was the antichrist. He
>even contradicted the 10 Commandments and the Law of
>Moses!}
>
>We have already seen that the Law of God prescribes
>the death penalty in Leviticus 20:13. “If a man
>also lie with mankind, as he lie lieth with a woman,
>both of them have committed an abomination: they shall
>surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon
>them." Some may say such a law is cruel and evil
>but the Bible says otherwise. "But we know that the
>Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the
>fact that law is not made for a righteous man, but for
>those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly
>and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who
>kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and
>immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and
>liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to
>sound teaching." I Timothy 1:8-10 NASV. Remember.
>it’s already a Law of the land that the Bible is the
>Word of God and is to be applied.
>
>{Proof that Mr. Peters' is an antichrist. He quotes
>the writtings of the man Jesus Christ said was a liar
>of Satan and the antichrist proving as Jesus Christ
>said, "You, (Professional Faith Merchants) draw near
>me with your lips but your heart follows Satan!" Mr.
>Peters' Bible was mistranslated and he is preaching
>false doctrine of Satan! The word "homosexual" didn't
>exist until coined by the U.S. Government in 1892!}
>
>HOMOSEXUALS WOULD HAVE PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE
>AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY but in reality they are only
>against the death penalty for homosexuals. Many
>of them would have their opponents die.
>
>The following headlines were in a special report from
>the Family Research Institute.
>
>“GAY LEADER CALLS FOR 'AIDS TERRORIST ARMY to kill
>Non-Homosexuals” (from The Wall Street Journal) That
>report gave the details of a Wall Street Journal
>Interview leader, Larry Kramer, who founded ACT UP and
>has been called Mr. Gay. USA, in the interview he is
>quoted as saying, "it hurts me to say I think the time
>for violence has now arrived...1’d like to see an AIDS
>terrorist army, like the Irgun (sic) which led the
>state 0f Israel. ” (History shows the Irgun (sic) was
>one of the first international terrorist bands started
>In the mid 1930's by Zionists. The Irgun (sic)
>considered its cause so just that the many hundreds of
>men, women and children killed by it, were deemed a
>necessary price.)
>
>Gay revolutionary Michael Swift has been reported as
>saying "If you dare cry faggot, fairy, queer at us, we
>will stab you in your cowardly hearts defile your dead
>puny bodies.” (Does this sound like tolerance to you?)
>"We shall raise vast private armies as Mishima did, to
>defeat you. We shall conquer the world because
>warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual
>love and honor are invincible as were the ancient
>Greek soldiers... We shall be victorious because we
>are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the
>oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit
>parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the
>ages. We too, are capable of firing guns and manning
>the barricades of the ultimate revolution. Tremble
>hetero swine, when we appear before you without our
>masks."
>
>Urrashi Vaid who has been called a "mainstream” gay
>leader and has been executive director of the National
>Gay and Lesbian Task Force, has also endorsed proposed
>military strategies.
>
>Not only has the death penalty been promoted by
>homosexuals,. it is also apparent the death
>penalty comes with diseases connected to the
>homosexual life style. Yet, homosexuals do not mind
>promoting their lifestyle which, in reality, is to
>promote the death penalty.
>
>Because Leviticus 20:13 is an existing Law of our
>Creator, the God of the Bible, then its a fact of life
>that DEATH will be the judgment for violating
>that Law. It becomes then just a matter of who and how
>many are going to die.
>
>WE CAN HAVE GOD'S LAW ON HOMOSEXUALS AND THE JUDGMENT
>OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN AMERICA and when or if
>we do, far fewer will die.
>
>In the final analysis, there can only be God’s Law or
>man’s law. Man’s law (or more accurately, man’s
>decree) according to public law 97-280, should be in
>line with or in accord with God's Law for there to be
>blessings as a nation of people. "Whereas the Bible,
>the Word of God, has made a unique contribution in
>shaping the United States as a distinctive and BLESSED
>nation and people." (Emphasis added)5
>
>History shows that the early settlements had the
>death penalty for transgression of the Law
>condemning homosexuality. For example, the following
>was in the General Court of Connecticut 1650: "By the
>General Court-Code of laws. established within the
>Jurisdiction of Connecticut-f650...If any man lies
>with mankind as he lies with women, both of them have
>committed abomination, they shall surely be put to
>death.” Leviticus 20: 13.6 History shows we
>were blessed as a nation and there was little
>homosexuality and all the ills, headaches and
>deaths that accompany it.
>
>According to an article entitled, Arguments Against
>Gay Rights Legislation, twenty five states now have or
>have had CRIMINAL SODOMY 7 Now, if states already have
>CRIMINAL SODOMY LAWS and if once in America, our
>forefathers enforced God's Law on homosexuality and
>since public law 97-280 endorses God's Law and
>basically tells its and allows us to do likewise, then
>we, today, can and should have God's Law concerning
>homosexuality (and its judgment of the death penalty).
>All it would take is Christians with half the guys and
>zeal the homosexuals have in spreading their life
>style, to start, state by state, (as the homosexuals
>have done) in getting such legislated.
>
>LAW IS NOT LAW UNLESS THE JUDGMENTS ARE APPLIED. Let's
>go back to the scenario of the school speed zone and
>its 20 MPH speed limit law. If one goes through the
>zone at 30 MPH and is never stopped, never ticketed
>and never fined, i.e., punished, then essentially the
>20 MPH speed limit law is worthless. Likewise, for the
>Judeo-Christian crowd to say they are against
>homosexuality because Bible Law is against it and yet
>refuse to advocate the judgment for violation of that
>law, is to consider and render that Bible Law as
>worthless. In other words, their argument against
>homosexuality rests upon something they have deemed as
>worthless and consequently all their arguments and
>feeble resistance (including trying to rescind the
>gains rightfully made by the homosexuals) are
>worthless. At best, all they can do is fight on the
>defense and never do they go on the offense to stop
>and eradicate a lawless behavior.
>
>The fact that the death penalty exists among us in the
>form of disease, serial murders, childless and
>grandchildless (sic) families (which brings the death
>of a family name or lineage) due to homosexuality,
>shows that Leviticus 20:13 is a Law. It's just a
>mailer of who and how many are going to die. For as
>the Scripture says. "Be not deceived. God Is not
>mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he
>also reap". Galatians 6:7 KJV. As a nation, people
>will reap the judgments of violating His existing
>proper Law with its accompanying proper intolerance
>and discrimination. After all, the Bible says not only
>is the homosexual worthy of the death penalty, but
>also those who give approval to it. “and although
>they know the ordinance of God, that those who
>practice such things are worthy of death, they not
>only do the same, but also give hearty approval to
>those who practice them." Romans 1:32 NASV.
>
>The fact that as a people we have opted to follow His
>existing Law In other areas is further testimony to
>the fact that we as a society can do likewise with
>homosexuality. We have for instance, instituted the
>death penalty for first degree murder and for
>kidnapping which is in accordance with God's Law.
>"But 1f a man come presumptuously upon his neighbor
>to slay him with guile; thou shalt take him from mine
>altar, that he may die." Exodus 21:14 KJV. 'and
>that stealeth a man. and selleth him, or if he be
>found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death."
> Exodus 21:16 KJV. Though the homosexual would have
>society believe otherwise of his perverted lifestyle,
>the Bible, interestingly enough, categorizes him with
>the murderer and kidnapper. (See I Corinthians 6:9.10
>and I Timothy 1:8-10)
>
>{Proof that Mr. Peters' is an antichrist. He quotes
>the writtings of the man Jesus Christ said was a liar
>of Satan and the antichrist proving as Jesus Christ
>said, "You, (Professional Faith Merchants) draw near
>me with your lips but your heart follows Satan!" Mr.
>Peters' Bible was mistranslated and he is preaching
>false doctrine of Satan! The word "homosexual" didn't
>exist until coined by the U.S. Government in 1892!}
>
>{Jesus Christ said,
>
>Matthew 5:17
>
> 17 ¶ Think not that I am come to destroy the law,
>or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to
>fulfil (sic).
>
>Truely, Mr. Peters is a man who denies Jesus Christ's
>teachings and pines for the return of the Satanically
>inspired Law of Moses}
>
>History shows that prior to the kidnapping of the
>Charles Lindbergh baby, kidnapping was a very
>prevalent, real threat to the wealthy. After the
>death penalty for kidnapping was instituted,
>however, that crime dried up in a hurry. The same
>would be true concerning the crime i.e., the breaking
>of God's Law dealing with homosexuality.
>
>CRIME, GOVERNMENT AND REVIVAL
>
>We have seen how homosexuality is a violation of God’s
>law as it’s revealed in the Bible. In 1 John 3:4
>(KJV), we read that sin is a violation of law.
>“Whosoever commiteth (sic) sin transgresseth also
>the law for sin is the transgression of the law.”
>In light of the definition of sin, another word that
>could be use for sin is crime. For example, according
>to the Bible, kidnapping and/or murder is a “sin” but
>governmentally, we generally refer to it as a “crime”.
>Now, regardless of whether judges, legislators or
>politicians decide to decree that such is not a crime
>or that such is allowed by a constitution or by
>freedom of choice, or whatever man can dream up, it is
>still a violation of the LAW OF GOD which is a sin or
>a crime.
>
>The Bible (which public law 97-280 says we are to
>apply) shows the role of a government to punish
>criminals, referred to in Romans 13 as those who do
>evil. “For rulers are not a cause of fear for good
>behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have fear of
>authority Do what is good, and you will have praise
>from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for
>good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it
>does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a
>minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon the
>one who practices evil.” (Romans 13:3-4 NASV)
>
>In other words, proper Godly government is intolerant
>of evil doers (i.e. criminals or sinners) and properly
>discriminates against the same by upholding and
>enforcing the Creator God’s already existing Law. This
>is the role of government and when the people of the
>land repent, they demand that just that be done,
>revival takes place and consequently a healing of the
>land. “and My people who are called by My name
>humble themselves and pray, and seek My face and turn
>from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven,
>will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."
>(II Chronicles 7:14 NASV)
>
>Such a revival and a healing of the land will never
>come so long as we allow politicians to court and/or
>fear the homosexual votes, or judges to rule against
>God. Or, as long as the people apathetic to the lies
>that homosexuals to choose their own life style or,
>what two people do in the privacy of their own home is
>of no concern or, as long as so-called Christians
>refuse to demand the enforcement of their God’s Law.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.