VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:17:39 11/27/99 Sat
Author: Blerbler
Subject: My complainmt about Speechy



Although I have no criticism of Speechy/ VC/ Eris The Goddess Of Chaos V's propositions, I have a few observations and comments to share. I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. She rarely tells her cronies that she plans to break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas she deems to be viperine. I'll repeat what I've already said: I am emphatically not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that her orations are devoid of logic and filled to the brim with hate and misinformation.
In a manner of speaking, Speechy's lackeys generate alienation and withdrawal, as though it were a disgrace to drive off and disperse the silly televangelists who interfere with the most important principles of democracy. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that there is much more of this to come. I mean, really. It is probably unwise to say this loudly, but I don't care what others say about Speechy. She's still crude, cranky, and she intends to censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype.
To enter into philosophic disputations with such heinous (or at least, morally-questionable) deadbeats is both insolent and tendentious. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely-accepted, notion that the Universe belongs to Speechy by right. When I was little, my father would sometimes pick me up, put me on his knee, and say "Speechy's "sincerity" is as transparent as the icy, uncaring look in her eyes." To what degree is she going to commit confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility? If I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less useless than Speechy. I see two problems with her methods of interpretation on a very fundamental level. First, it must be stated quite categorically that she can pervert any established ideology. And second, she wants to saddle the economy with crippling debt. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.
Although this has been overlooked or ignored by the established scientific community, Speechy wouldn't be able to place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfillment in our personal and professional lives if she were working on a level playing field. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that I must protest her use of snooty proletariats to provide the pretext for police-state measures. Look at what's happened since she first ordered her henchmen to rob, steal, cheat, and murder: Views once considered callous are now considered ordinary. Views once considered appalling are now considered perfectly normal. And the most unregenerate of Speechy's views are now seen as gospel by legions of the most feral drug addicts I've ever seen. Still, Speechy's assistants would sooner ally with evil than oppose it.
It should be clear by this point that it is undeniable by anyone but the worst types of irrational control freaks there are that I speak from experience. Speechy's bait-and-switch tactics deserve to be criticized because they overthrow democratic political systems. I hope I don't need to remind you that Speechy's writings constitute one of the many conduits of terrorism in our culture, but it's still true, and we must do something about it. There are two reasons which induce me to submit Speechy's theories to a special examination: 1) Speechy is up to no good, and 2) Speechy shows a curious unwillingness to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Speechy-induced disaster. I must admit that the second point, in particular, sometimes fills me with anxious concern. This state of affairs demands the direct assault on those churlish generalizations that seek to traduce and discredit everyone but vile segregationists. Now, more than ever, we must see through the haze of careerism. Let's be realistic: her goals coalesce with those of vapid degenerates. Which brings me to my point. Speechy's disquisitions are soulless, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements. It is tempting to look for simple solutions to that problem, but there are no simple solutions.
When Speechy was first found trying to do the entire country a grave disservice, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Speechy is planning to leave behind a wake of arrogant reaction, I'm indeed terrified. For heaven's sake, it is not too far-fetched to claim that the long-term consequences of her effusions are rarely examined, let alone subjected to scientific scrutiny. While Speechy might not pose a threat to personal autonomy and social development per se, if Speechy would abandon her name-calling and false dichotomies, it would be much easier for me to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by Speechy and her helpers.
No matter how much her slogans are rationalized, they still create an unruly world of guilt and shame. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Speechy. To be fair, we should give her a taste of her own medicine. People are looking for answers, not ideology. Under these conditions, sadistic ideologues like Speechy often think they have the right to obstruct various important things.
Her toadies say that nothing would help society more than for them to confuse, disorient, and disunify. Sorry, I don't buy that. Her hypocrisy has reached a new low. However true that is, she is one of those foolish bloodsuckers who quotes the Bible but never reads it.
While Speechy's sentiments may seem cocky, they're in agreement with her unenlightened perversions. It is grossly misleading merely to claim that the scantiness of Speechy's abstract knowledge directs her sentiments more to the world of despotism. From this perspective, the extent of collaboration between Speechy and antihumanist slubberdegullions is unknown, but presumably significant. As I mentioned before, her invectives reflect a prurient bias that will parlay personal and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire in the near future. In short, Speechy/ VC/ Eris The Goddess Of Chaos V's unscrupulous policies are an epiphenomenon of vulgar nepotism.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.