Re: Losers/neal -- C6 Firebird Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:34:47 01/21/03 Tue
Author: Bob
Subject: Re: Losers/neal
In reply to: neal 's message, "Re: Losers" on 10:46:32 01/21/03 Tue

>>Look Einstein,
>>
>>The only one whining and bitching is you. It is a GTO
>>Web-Site that encourages comments on the 2004 GTO. If
>>it bothers you so much to read the negative comments
>>on the 2004 GTO then I would suggest that you quit
>>logging on to the GTO Web-Sites and reading the
>>comments. It does not bother me to read positive
>>comments regarding the 2004 GTO. There are some
>>posted from Australia and I am sure it is a fine car,
>>but it is a poor choice to be a GTO and will not be
>>able to compete with its competition
>>
>>Unfortunately, you are probably right and the Monaro
>>is coming and probably will not change, but that does
>>not mean that consumers have to like it, lose their
>>right to comment on it, or buy it.
>>
>>Pontiac would have been smarter to keep the name
>>Monaro on the current car and waited to develop a GTO.
>> I believe that those that have stated their
>>disappointment in the looks and horsepower of the 2004
>>GTO have done so in an intelligent way and have
>>clearly articulated the reasons for it. Unlike you,
>>who just seems to wants to snivel and try to slam
>>people for their opposing opinions. You need to get a
>>life and not let the fact that a large number of
>>Pontiac fans are disappointed in Pontiac�s decision
>>regarding the 2004 GTO. Hate to break it to you, but
>>there are several other 2004 GTO Web-Sites out there
>>and I would recommend that you not read those comments
>>either.
>>
>>Not only do I believe that half of us will not buy a
>>2004 GTO, but I also believe that the 2004 GTO will
>>flop. Time will tell, and despite your dislike for
>>ford, it is my bet that the 2004 Mustang is going to
>>walk away with what could have been a lot of GTO
>>sells. I am all for bashing Rice Burners, but I would
>>not under estimate Ford or Mopar.
>>
>>
>>By the way, wrong again! I have purchased a new a car
>>in 1997, 2000 and 2002 and have never owned a Camry or
>>Honda. I own two out of the GM Stable, a Pontiac
>>Grand Am, Chevy Truck and the other is a Jeep Wrangler
>>Sahara.
>>
>>I guess by your standards the fact that I own a Jeep
>>means I lose my right to complain about the 2004
>>Pontiac GTO. Oh Well, Too Bad! The 2004 GTO is still
>>under powered and looks to common to be a GTO!

hmmm. shut up! you obviously have no life, just
>remember this song to help you out! Snap, Crackle,
>Pop, get a life loser!!!!!

Oh come on Neal at crocotor@hotmail, is that the best that you can do? What do you want me to say? sticks and stone will break my bones? A little childish don�t you think? What�s the problem? Can not write, spell or put a sentence together. Open a book some time it may help!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]