Re: The bride who wears the pants -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:49:44 09/21/12 Fri
Author: john
Subject: Re: The bride who wears the pants
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: The bride who wears the pants" on 11:25:42 09/21/12 Fri

i don't know whether to yawn or laugh...

john

I am hearing some rumours and rumblings that some
>>c-not-of-c members have finally had a gut full.
>>
>>First of all, let's remember something. The first
>>publicly made departure from the true gospel of Jesus
>>Christ came with the ordination of women. That was
>>kind of a tough call, after all, women are of great
>>worth.
>>
>>But, as time has showed us, the women were ordained to
>>be sycophants to the new program. Why, one of them has
>>gone so far as to stand by her bisexual husband. I'm
>>sure she wouldn't dare say it was wrong of him to have
>>such a cheating heart.
>>
>>In the scriptures Jesus Christ is portrayed as the
>>bridegroom, and the church is portrayed as the bride.
>>In the case of the community-not-of-Christ the bride
>>decided to wear the pants. The ordaining of women
>>showed that the church decided that "she" would make
>>the decisions, change the ordinances, and tell the
>>bridegroom how to conduct Himself. Actually this is
>>going on in not only the c-not-of-c, but also many of
>>the "Christian" churches, even Restoration factions.
>>
>>In a summary, the bride decided to emasculate her
>>husband.
>>
>>Let's see what happens. I believe the scrourge has
>>begun.
>>
>>Lois
>
>Hey, guess what!?! We could carry this metaphor
>further.
>
>The bride didn't want to have relations with her
>bridegroom. She wanted to have relations with another
>woman.
>
>Hmmm. Could that other woman be the National Council
>of Churches?
>
>Lois

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: The bride who wears the pants -- john, 16:50:54 09/21/12 Fri
Re: The bride who wears the pants -- George, 19:45:53 09/21/12 Fri
- Re: The bride who wears the pants -- john, 07:25:10 09/22/12 Sat
  - Re: The bride who wears the pants -- George, 19:07:40 09/22/12 Sat