VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Monday, January 14, 11:55:40am
Author: NickD
Subject: Re: No Lampley?
In reply to: SPC Fan 's message, "Back from New Rochelle" on Sunday, January 13, 08:37:57pm

Lampley does not play entire game and there are no questions from this board and no statement from SPC? I would say the level of interst in this team is zero..No body cares enough to even comment.Loyal,Peacock,Crawford,Oldtimer,Sludge,Peacock Blue??

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Re: No Lampley? -- Sludge, Monday, January 14, 12:03:18pm [1]

Should one comment and come under criticism once more for disparaging the kid?

Oooooops...I think I just did.

[Edit]

[> [> [> Yet no comments about the other alternative -- Peacock, Monday, January 14, 01:19:53pm [1]

Right now last years team looked more organized than this one. They were more competitive in the MAAC only tiring out for lack of bodies, and that includes Brock. And JD had conflicts with at least three D1 level players. One before the season and two after. They left and while not at a level to get decent other positions, one has to ask, now with Lampley, who is potentially the bad actor. Starting to develop a pattern. We may not know the story, but the results are showing ominous potentials.

[Edit]

[> [> [> [> Re: Yet no comments about the other alternative -- oldtimer#1, Monday, January 14, 03:18:13pm [1]

Just to clarify the issues for further discussion. There are some requirements for student athletes when, if broken, a coach has no control over the mandated consequences. Study hall (and that is the original rumor concerning DL posted,but not necessarily fact) is one of those circumstances.



Furthermore,my sources indicate that Dunne has been exremely supportive of Darrell both on and off the court. Much more so than some posters, including myself, have been. He has stuck with Darrell and has given him every opportunity top show his skills. Several posts were made to that effect by our regular posters early on when another coach could have easily pulled the player.




Peacock, of course, is raising other issues which are not addressed here. However, if we are just speaking Darrell, JD has been quite supportive of the young man. What has happened, I have no idea.

[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> That is the real problem -- Peacock, Monday, January 14, 04:49:48pm [1]

We have no idea. Speculation yes. However what we see is the problem and DL is part of that, and I doubt would have changed many opinions at this point if he did play.

[Edit]

[> [> Re: No Lampley? -- oldtimer#1, Monday, January 14, 12:16:09pm [1]

No question everyone is interested, but that would only be questions without answers. One would have thought that the announcer would have information but ??? Rather comment from solid information than speculate.

[Edit]

[> [> When you start to see the writing on the wall -- Peacock, Monday, January 14, 01:24:42pm [1]

You think you are either crazy, or not worth questioning anymore.

Dunne was another one of those surprise choices by Stein. Need anyone say any more.

[Edit]

[> [> [> One thing is certain in your eyes -- Sludge, Monday, January 14, 07:23:47pm [1]

The writing has always been on the wall for Stein.

[Edit]

[> [> [> [> Not for the idiot, College BB fan -- Peacock, Monday, January 14, 08:37:43pm [1]

One wonders if he would ever be able to offer a knowledgable comment.

[Edit]

[> [> [> [> Re: One thing is certain in your eyes -- Peacock, Monday, January 14, 08:47:05pm [1]

I actually should read closer. Another one of your sentence that says nothing about your view of Stein's tenure. I almost have to assume you side with College BB fan as he used your garbage comment about managing with limited resources. Hell anybody can manage with that, because the limits are specific and the goal of the allocation was to strangle athletics and Bill did his part with bad decision after bad decision. The only flaw in my statement is Stein tried to avoid making decisions at every turn.

By the way, lets here your praise for the patron saint of the present condition from your eyes. Expecting an opinion is a stretch.

[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: One thing is certain in your eyes -- Sludge, Monday, January 14, 09:56:27pm [1]

Like the Stein-Loughran connection, now you wish to hold me responsible for College BB's comments. Hell, weren't you warned for doing your oral study on all those reluctant cadaver's? :-)

Let me allow credit for your rather creative means by association to surgically attack your current object of scorn. Keep up the dismissive effort and your mural will soon be complete.

[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Weren't you in Dallas? -- Peacock, Tuesday, January 15, 12:04:54am [1]

And you called me the politician. Those boys got nothing on you.

[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> No, couldn't get tickets -- Sludge, Tuesday, January 15, 07:42:38pm [1]

But I'll bet you were tops in the Mach 1V exam.

[Edit]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.