VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:59:26 04/11/00 Tue
Author: kande
Subject: Return to Me reviews - don't read if you think you might like it

Yikes! These are excerpts of reviews in the 4/7 Washington Post:

"Only one last question remains, though it sustains (wanly) the entire second half of the film. That is: What will Bob do when he learns that Grace lives only because Helen has died and that that's Helen's ticker ticktocking away in Grace's chest cavity? Alas, what Duchovny does is truly terrible: He tries to act."

and...

"But "Return to Me" is so phony it makes your gums ache. It's like having your head clamped in a vise and being force-fed sugar cubes by an ex-Up-With-People member who now owns an Amway franchise and knows what's best, dammit!"

and...

"How else to explain "Return to Me," which does for romantic movies what Stalin did for civic freedom? With so many bad movies around, past and present, I guess I should temper my vitriol. But really, this movie is the worst thing I've sat through . . . in days."

and finally...

"RETURN TO ME (PG, 116 minutes) - Contains stunningly brain-dead writing and unnecessarily gruesome material, all of this completely inappropriate for children and, come to think of it, adults."

To show they are an equal opportunity basher, this was in the Post's 4/11 tv column:

"Meanwhile, about 12 million of you tuned in to "The X-Files," which, I'll concede, was an important episode in that it demonstrated that any fool can direct a TV drama series--in this case, star Gillian Anderson."

Ouch!

Needless to say, the Washington Post has not been a promoter of The X-Files. The writers are also a little too enamored with their own cleverness.

krh

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.