Various XF related stuff -- X-Philes World-X-Files Movie 2

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:21:19 07/08/01 Sun
Author: Islandgirl
Subject:

Various XF related stuff

A couple of XF items I ran across recently:
1.) I've started reading the mystery novels of Aileen Schumacher, who has a couple of characters whose relationship kind of resembles the MSR (at least in its early stages) but at one point in the novel "Affirmative Reaction" David Alvarez (the main male character) says: "Hell, a year ago I suggested we change our name from the Special Case Task Force to the X Case Task Force, just so we could refer to our active investigations as the X Files. No one seemed to appreciate the idea."
I just thought it was funny that here I am, reading along and thinking "these two remind me of Mulder and Scully" and then the author actually mentions the X Files!
2.) Did anybody see the article about Tea Leoni in today's (7/8/01) "Parade" magazine? They had a very nice picture of her and DD. She also said that they'd both decided early on they weren't going to run out and get a divorce the first moment the weren't wildly, passionately in love with each other, but would view their marriage as a committment they'd made and intended to keep, regardless of the ebb and flow of their feelings. I thought this was a very refreshing attitude. Too many people (not just in Hollywood, although the attitude seems especially prevalent there) seem to think that once you're no longer in the starry-eyed, romantic phrase of your marriage, it's time to end things.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]