VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:14:10 11/29/22 Tue
Author: .
Author Host/IP: ool-18e43fa3.dyn.optonline.net / 24.228.63.163
Subject: I think a straight % that qualifies would make the most sense. The discrepancy between the boys and girls comps. as is is insane.
In reply to: WQ 's message, "Agreed the regions need to be re-distributed so that comp size is more equal or just have a straight % that qualifies." on 15:04:16 11/29/22 Tue


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> A simple % does not work, because for example in a boy's competition you could have three dancers and maybe all good, and only 1 would qualify. This would not work. -- No name, 12:52:47 11/30/22 Wed (NoHost/204.110.222.97)


[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> So right now all boys would qualify, but in a girls competition with 110 and 75 of them are good, but they don’t all qualify. How is that fair? At least the percentage would be fair. -- ., 17:34:39 11/30/22 Wed (ool-18e43fa3.dyn.optonline.net/24.228.63.163)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Use marks instead of ranking for qualifiers after IP. -- No name, 10:38:52 12/02/22 Fri (t.marzetti.bear1.cincinnati1.level3.net/4.1.71.54)

You may have 1st 2nd etc and a few ties with Irish Points, but World and National qualifiers could be based off judges marks instead of Irish Points. Use the 10% bottom dancers’ score plus ~2 points. So for a group of 100 dancers, the top 10% would world qualify, plus anyone who had judges mark totals within ~2 points of that 10th dancer’s judges score total. So if there were 5 dancers who within a point or two of judges marks of the 10th dancer they would qualify. A single point from one judge can separate the 10th place and 15th place. Qualifying should be about skill, not ranking.

Boys is a separate argument as there are limited number of boys to keep the tradition and culture well.

More dancers at nationals and worlds is just more money and better economy.

Every dancer should be well celebrated for dancing, it’s hard to see any dancer walking away without recalling (frustrates, crying, ready to hang up the shoes), and those that did recall should be truly thankful and grateful for having competitors who danced with them, teachers knowing they didn’t have a chance. Celebrate all the dancers who tried and supported Oireachtas by attending.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> How about just qualify those with raw scores over 90% (or another chosen number). That way the judges truly pick the qualifiers. -- No name, 15:25:13 12/02/22 Fri (NoHost/204.110.222.153)


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.