VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:03:32 05/09/02 Thu
Author: Susie
Author Host/IP: bgp425870bgs.union01.nj.comcast.net / 68.36.197.75
Subject: Hi Judi
In reply to: Judi 's message, "Got my Viral Load results, need some expert interpretations" on 19:52:28 05/09/02 Thu

I am able to compare your viral load in IU's. The other number they give you is the new measurement and it is about impossible to compare to the old way. So it is good they gave you both ways.

Viral load is really not considered changed unless there is a greater than 4 log difference. You certainly had that in going from 1 million to 59,000. I think you are wise to continue with the treatment. There have been some people who do get to undetected at the 6 month mark and you are not there yet. However, they usually do not sustain the response. The best indicator of sustaining a response is going undetected very early. I too wish you had had the biopsy. Would you consider having one after treatment is over if you end up a non-responder? They are finding that keeping people on very low doses of Peg (no riba)is helping their livers and without a biopsy you wouldn't know if your liver is far enough progressed to be a candidate for maintenance therapy.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> Yes I would have the biopsy. -- Judi, 22:19:29 05/09/02 Thu (adsl-34-57-203.mia.bellsouth.net/67.34.57.203)

Of course I would have the biopsy. I am sorry that I did not do one, but it is too late for that regret. I appreciate your reply. For some reason I feel that this will work in the long run, just a cock-eyed optimist. The testing that my doctor does is the one that shows up to >1000000 even if you have more so I am very happy to see the change that it is showing now. Thanks again for the feedback.

Judi

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]











Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]





Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.