Re: yes, really. -- Council of The Grey

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:08:12 09/03/00 Sun
Author: CRACKpot
Subject: Re: yes, really.
In reply to: avalanche. 's message, "yes, really." on 11:01:59 09/03/00 Sun

>
> > First you say that you IQ factor is around 130 than
> > it�s 187
>
> and how does that constitute lying, my IQ was
> factored at 130 when i was about 12/13, the IQ
> increases, it's dynamic, not static, recent tests have
> shown an iq of around 185/195, pure fact, this is not
> lying, that is simple dynamics.
>
>
> than you say one day that you are 19 years
> > old than suddenly you are 17 the next time you are
> 18,
>
> excuse me, i have never said i'm 19. secondly, in
> case you haven't noticed, but time progresses, so if i
> say i'm 17, and later i say 18, then you can be pretty
> sure that a birthday passed. (duh?)
>
>
>
>
> > once you type 400 letters a minute the next time you
> > type 500 letters a minute (not 399 not 401 but
> exactly
> > 400, not 499 not 501 but exactly 500),
>
> i never said "exactly", obviously when one says such
> things one means "approximately", if i say 400 and
> another time 500 that is not lying, that simply means
> that it i can't 100% accurately name the number, one
> day it might be around 500, the other it might be
> around 300, such is the nature of dynamic things. duh.
>
>
> than you say
> > you are 200 cm tall than next time you are 196 cm
> tall
> > what happened did you shrink?
>
> naturally such things are not to be taken completely
> literally, when one says one is 2 metres tall when in
> actual reality he is 196CM'S tall, that's simply to
> round things of, that is not lying.
>
>
>
> YOU, lie almost ALWAYS,
>
> again, false. as i have shown, none of the things
> you have mentioned have been "actual" lies, only if
> you take them purely literal (which is not something
> an intelligent person would do) do they become lies,
> but obviously they were never meant as such.
>
> > and don�t try to twist things around.
>
> excuse me, but YOU are the one trying to twist
> things around, you take my words, and then twist them
> around to make it appear as though they're threaths
> (you btw failed at making them appear as such).
>
>
> I will take back
> > the liar thing when you PROVE to me beyond any doubt
> > that you have a time machine and that you can go back
> > in time and get younger also when you prove to me
> > beyond ANY doubt that you did shrink from 200 cm to
> > 196. And you lie that you never lied on these boards.
> > You are just a pathological liar!
> > Brain
>
> as i have shown, the things you have mentioned are
> only lies when one takes them absolutely literal,
> apparantly you have to resort to taking everything i
> say literal now in order to show that i'm lying, if
> one takes everything a person says literal, one will
> quickly find many lies. but since they are not
> intended to be taken literal in the first place, they
> are under normal circumstances, not lies at all, and
> even if they were, they would be irrelevant. too small
> to be of any significance.

IQ tests change statisticaly if one is taken a different IQ test from the one they took before. An easier one might have a lower scoring range or scale. Avalanche, did you take a different one the second time around? Some tend to look at speed, academics, and/or arts. The most accurate ones are the ones that have them all combined

To prove my point I will bring an IQ test here and even give the person who takes it their score.

CRACKpot

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: yes, really. -- avalanche, 02:39:20 09/04/00 Mon
- Re: yes, really. -- CRACKpot, 03:01:54 09/04/00 Mon
  - Re: yes, really. -- avalanche, 03:31:54 09/04/00 Mon
    - Re: yes, really. -- CRACKpot, 04:01:11 09/04/00 Mon
      - Re: yes, really. -- avalanche, 05:10:52 09/04/00 Mon