FBI lies over Flight attendants Phone Call message --

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:23:48 10/11/01 Thu
Author: Peter
Subject: FBI lies over Flight attendants Phone Call message

FBI lies over Flight attendants Phone Call message
Posted By: Peter <myers@cyberone.com.au>
Date: Tuesday, 9 October 2001, at 12:22 p.m.

BBC News reported the transcript of a phone call from a flight attendant on the first plane to hit the WTC.
Madeline Amy Sweeney described how hijackers stabbed passengers and then diverted the plane.
"I see water and buildings. Oh my God! Oh my God!"
The BBC report says, �The FBI has named five hijackers on board Flight
11, whereas Ms Sweeney spotted only four. Also, the seat numbers she
gave were different from those registered in the hijackers' names.�
What does this last sentence mean? Madeline Sweeney listed the seat
numbers of the hijackers, so that they could be identified. But the FBI
is pinning the blame on a different set of people - with different seat
numbers - with Arabic-sounding names.
IS THIS A SET-UP?
<a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1556000/1556096.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1556000/1556096.stm</a>

Bin Laden link suggested BEFORE WTC attack!
Posted By: Peter <myers@cyberone.com.au>
Date: Tuesday, 9 October 2001, at 12:35 p.m.
Here's a report from the Washington Post:
Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack
By Brian McWilliams, Newsbytes
27 Sep 2001, 11:48 AM CST
Officials at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed today that
two employees received text messages warning of an attack on the
World Trade Center two hours before terrorists crashed planes
into the New York landmarks.
<a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/170583.html">http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/170583.html</a>
Also Mossad knew of the operation beforehand. The Jerusalem Post says
Mossad warned the CIA of the plot:
<a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/09/17/News/News.34954.html">http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/09/17/News/News.34954.html</a>
and TOLD THE CIA WHO THE CULPRITS WERE (my emphasis), i.e. pinned the blame on Bin Laden etc in advance.
WERE THEY SIMPLY TRYING TO PLANT THE "BIN LADEN" IDEA IN THE CIA'S HEAD BEFORE THE EVENT? All sounds a little too convenient.

Dr Rice: We need a common enemy
Posted By: Peter <myers@cyberone.com.au>
Date: Tuesday, 9 October 2001, at 1:36 p.m.
Here is a statement by a first hand witness to the following event:
Condolezza Rice, Bush's National Security Advisor, was in Houston to give a
speech in March of 2000. This was prior to Bush assuming the Presidency and
her assuming her new position in his administration. She had worked under
Bush Senior as head of Russian and East European Affairs. Her words were
most prophetic. She said, and these are exact quotes:
"We need a common enemy to unite us."
"We need a new threat as a marker to where we will lead."
"Seperation of powers is a problem for foreign policy."
These statements were not in response to questions but were in the body of
her speech.
Afterwards a question was asked about America losing it's moral authority. She was visibly angered and disturbed by the comments
and simply retorted. "We have other means of asserting our authority".
Meaning, of course, military might and deception.
Doesn't the September 11 crashbombing fit perfectly into her idea of what "we need", what Bush wants. Bush has, to date, been the greatest benefactor of the events of September 11 and for the foreseeable future will continue to be.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]