| Subject: Re: from Gregory Cipkins, troublemaker |
Author:
Anonymous
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 11:39:22 04/30/02 Tue
In reply to:
's message, "from Gregory Cipkins, troublemaker" on 13:18:46 04/29/02 Mon
This is a good example of people not trying to write coherently. It starts out with Gregory Cipkins in the first person, then switches to 3rd person (no explanation) and then to--------???? who is speaking in the 3rd paragraph? People, P-L-E-A-S-E, try your best to write as though you, yourself have never read it before and make sure, FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE, that what you are saying makes sense. IOW, try to put yourself into the reader's (for the first time...) shoes and then you will understand the need to write and convey in a way that all can understand.
Thank you.
>The following by Gregory Cipkins 609 926 9896 Somers
>Point, NJ cipkins@aol.com
>
>Greg Cipkins is acting in character, being an eternal
>foul mouth and whiner. He was kicked out of the
>straub group and kicked out of Bradford, a long time
>ago. Just to give a little perspective.
>
>I just want to show my appreciation for these guys who
>think they would rescue you all from your losses with
>court orders. You all should know who to thank when
>they tie up Madame for good.
>
>
>>>I would like to hear from some Kevin Straub backers
>as
>>>to their thoughts on Bradford, now that this program
>>>has gone the way of every other scam. Our warning on
>>>this forum was that once Kevin touches any program,
>it
>>>is doomed to turn into a scam. We all believed
>Madame
>>>and her boorish e-mails yet, even she, was unable to
>>>prevent the Kevin curse. Now, Kevin doesn't even
>>>provide any info on the status of Bradford.
>>
>>Have you ever thought the problem may be just as
>>muchwith Madame as with Kevin?? I mean, even he
>>cannot prevent her from making payments if she wants
>>to and on the other hand, neither can he make her do
>>so if she doesn't, which is obviously the case. I am
>>not saying Kevin wants to help Bradford members by
>>somehow forcing Madame to start paying because I think
>>He does not care. As long as his pockets are lined
>>then to hell with everyone else.
>>----------------AND----------------
>>Madame is also responsible for making the choice to
>>join the ranks of one more internet scam by refusing
>>to pay and simply sitting on our money. Does anyone
>>know if there is a way to get a court order to force
>>the liquidation of whatever assets she has our money
>>tied up in?
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 