VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:47:44 07/14/01 Sat
Author: Joe Jackson
Subject: Re: Negative Sleepers?
In reply to: Paul J 's message, "Negative Sleepers?" on 13:49:23 07/13/01 Fri

Yes, that would add more ralism to the draft.

>Theres been a lot of pro's and con's for having
>holdouts in the draft.
>
>However everyone admits the sleepers work in the
>draft. So sometimes you draft someone who is much
>better than what you think, ie you could draft a
>'Terrell Davis' in Round 6.
>
>But what about players who are 'negative sleepers' ?
>Eg you trade a half decent WR in Round 2 but you
>realise then his stats are much worse than you think.
>????
>
>In the FWL you obviously see all the players stats,
>would it be good to have 8 sleepers and 2 'negative'
>sleepers ?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.