VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07/17/03 6:10pm
Author: Harry" Fox Shmooze" PTesties
Author Host/IP: 152.163.252.195
Subject: Re: You sure it's not from Matt Druge?..........
In reply to: BMF 's message, "El Paso Newspaper (home of UTEP) dis's BWC" on 07/16/03 11:21am

>I thought this was relevant given that Cal Poly will
>be playing UTEP in a couple months. The article is
>about WAC conference re-alignment..., not BWC
>realignment.
>
>Here's the link:
>
>http://www.mattdruge.com

..........because if it is, it must be true!

>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
>
>If UTEP is unable to realign with old conference
>mates, such as New Mexico and BYU, its next best
>option would be to head east.
>
>Well, pray it's invited east.
>
>It's because the western side of the geographically
>axed-in-two WAC is composed of schools whose lineage
>goes back to the inferior Big West.
>
>Here are three points:
>
>1.) UTEP's true home is with the old WAC: New Mexico,
>BYU, Utah, Colorado State and Wyoming. Those are the
>opponents UTEP fans pay to see. They bring out
>passion, especially New Mexico and BYU.
>
>But it doesn't seem likely to happen. After all, they
>dumped UTEP when they left the WAC to form the
>Mountain West.
>
>2.) With conference reorganization supposedly coming
>-- at least by 2005 -- there is serious talk that some
>east WAC members will dump the west and form a new
>conference. They don't need the west. SMU and Rice
>were once members of the legendary Southwest
>Conference. Their fans and rich alumni aren't
>passionate about west WACers.
>
>So it's only logical, then, that SMU and Rice get
>together with two other ex-SWC teams, TCU and Houston
>of Conference USA. Keep present east WAC members UTEP,
>Tulsa and Louisiana Tech. But UTEP gets in only if New
>Mexico State comes along as its traveling partner. No
>sense flying 800 miles from Houston to play just UTEP.
>Get two league games. Save travel money.
>
>SMU and TCU would be a one-flight, two-game stop, too.
>So would Rice-Houston. Louisiana Tech-Tulsa would be a
>puddle-jump flight of 280 miles.
>
>That's eight teams. So add North Texas for nine, then
>there will be balanced conference football schedules
>-- four home and four away games a year.
>
>It would be a league recognized by the whole country
>because of SMU-TCU and Rice-Houston.
>
>3.) Being in the western WAC would be like being
>abandoned a second time.
>
>Or third.
>
>When UTEP's Border Conference folded in 1961, the
>MIners were not invited to join the WAC -- a merge
>between the Border and Skyline Conferences.
>
>UTEP and Colorado State finally got in six years
>later.
>
>When the WAC started big-time expansion -- taking in
>littler Big West schools and the easterns -- the old
>WAC bolted and didn't invite UTEP to join the new
>Mountain West.
>
>Now, if an eastern WAC reorganization doesn't take in
>UTEP, the Miners would be left with the schools both
>the MWC and new league abandoned: Hawaii, Boise State,
>Fresno State and San Jose State.
>
>If the east does form a new conference without UTEP,
>the western WAC (which now includes Nevada), would
>likely have to to bring in New Mexico State and Utah
>State to have eight members.
>
>And UTEP would find itself in New Mexico State's old
>league -- the Pacific Coast Conference which turned
>into the Big West, which dropped football because most
>football-playing schools were promoted to the WAC --
>then dumped.
>
>Bet UTEP is lobbying hard to rejoin New Mexico and
>BYU.
>
>But Plan 2, sticking in Texas, isn't a bad alternative.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.